User talk:OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages

This is OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mikado Cake has been accepted[edit]

Mikado Cake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spinster300 (talk) 16:18, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, tight tight tight tight! OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages (talk) 20:50, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hi OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages! I noticed your contributions to Azerbaijani cuisine and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 22:58, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, thank you OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages (talk) 23:43, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Əzərbəyəniləri per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Əzərbəyəniləri. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spicy (talk) 16:10, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I might share the same location like a sockpuppet and use multiple accounts, but even If I was a sockpuppet, why would you ban me? I never made a destructive edit or vandalised articles. All my additions were well sourced, I linked many things, I deleted unsourced content with nationalistic claims, I improved so many pages, yet they now get reverted to a repetitive version. Like in „List fo Azerbaijani soups and stews“ article there was written „Azerbaijani soups influenced Armenian cuisine“ and there werent even any sources for this nationalistic claim I obviously deleted. All my edits were good and even acknowledged by veteran editors who saw my edits. I created a well sourced wikipedia article enlargening the scope of wikipedia and the reason it even exists is because an reviewer looked over the article and decided that it was good. Banning me doesnt make wikipedia better or prevent vandalism, banning me means loosing a good editor who only improved articles and rather helped wikipedia to be more objective and source related than to damage wikipedia, which I never did with this account or the Niggumo account. Please unban me, I havent made any destructive edits whatsover on my active 2 accounts. Banning me and especially reverting my edits means letting unsourced information, nationalistic claims with no source, lies and propaganda to be present on wikipedia(look at my edits they improved wikipedia) Banning me doesnt prevent anything, what It does is making wikipedia worse and loosing a good editor that helps wikipedia to be better. Also, dont you assume good faith? Even If I was a sockpuppet wont you acknowledge that people can change? Afterall judging from my edits I definetly just improved wikipedia and didnt do anything distuptive with my two accounts.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:13, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

OnlyCreatesNewWikiPages (talk) 19:42, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]