Jump to content

User talk:Openlander

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

i love

  • freedom
  • information
  • constructive feedback/criticism
  • collaboration
  • life

Thanks for your biology contributions[edit]

You might be interested in the Molecular and Cellular Biology Wikiproject. --JWSchmidt 05:20, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

cool. i'll check it out. thanks for the welcome! Openlander 05:22, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dioptre[edit]

See Talk:Dioptre for why I removed the section you added. I added a better treatment of this at Magnifying glass. See also Magnification.--Srleffler 05:50, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i appreciate the education; thanks! i put back just an explanatory pointer (hopefully not fatally flawed) to the section you identified, since people will come to Diopter wanting to answer this question Openlander 20:03, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Surface tension[edit]

Very nice observation on surface tension in the pressure jump section!!! You were right: it was a mistake Knights who say ni 12:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Profanity[edit]

Hi. I merged your "Foreign profanity" article back to Profanity. I saw in your first comment that you created the article as a spin-off, because the mother article was getting too long. I agree with you there, and I suggested some possible solutions on the talk page of the "profanity" article. TomorrowTime 01:30, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


An article that you created, List of swear words, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of swear words Thank you. SkierRMH 08:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To view this deleted article, theoretically any sysop (admin) can do this for you. The guidelines actually cover what you want to do, so any one of them should be able to make the page available for trans-wikifictaion to wiktionary. I'm not a sysop, so you'll have to go over to their page Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention and get someone to help you. SkierRMH 18:44, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on List of non-English profanities, by JackLumber, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because List of non-English profanities fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

already transwikified; unencyclopedic; unverifiable; unsourced; unreliable; original research; basically useless


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting List of non-English profanities, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate List of non-English profanities itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on HFSS, by Harlowraman (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because HFSS fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

web


To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting HFSS, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be inactive, but I just wanted to say that this is a great image. So much information in one little diagram! Plasticup T/C 15:43, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thank you! i have been contemplating another lately, too. Openlander (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: source[edit]

Sorry I didn't reply right away, but I haven't been on Wikipedia for a while. I would love to send or upload the source file; it is on another computer, though, and it could take a week or so to find it. I will do so ASAP. --Canadian Joeldude (talk) 13:57, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

i look forward to your upload with bated breath, and will send you a copy of my derivative once it's done. you may be amused. Openlander (talk) 16:59, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
if it would be easier, you could just email it to me at openlander@gmail.com which i would appreciate immensely! Openlander (talk) 07:13, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Madagascar Biodiversithy Center.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem
File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Madagascar Biodiversithy Center.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 05:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 05:30, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs[edit]

Hello Openlander! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 902 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Heinrich Holland - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Image Deletion[edit]

A deletion discussion has just been created at Category talk:Unclassified Chemical Structures, which may involve one or more orphaned chemical structures, that has you user name in the upload history. Please feel free to add your comments.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asparagine side chain.PNG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Asparagine side chain.PNG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:21, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heinrich Holland[edit]

Hi Openlander,
You started the page on Heinrich Holland, and I just wanted to inform you that he has died. See in memoriam ... . Back on May 21 actually from cancer. I came across him on at the http://astrobiology.nasa.gov website, checked here and found that he was still listed as living! I have updated expanded his page: diff. Just FYI, regards 220 of Borg 22:03, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for letting me know. He was my advisor at Harvard, and quite an amazing person and thinker. I will miss him. Nice expansion of his page! Much appreciated. Openlander (talk) 00:19, 8 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Openlander. Sorry to hear you knew Holland, though I am now glad that I did let you know. He had a pretty good run (85 years, married for 57! & 4 kids) for someone who was probably lucky to be alive, considering his origins (born Jewish in Nazi Germany!) Probably one of my larger BLP expansions. Though, as an IP editor I did a fair one on James Arness, luckily before he died, though his brother Peter Graves had just done so. Regards, 220 of Borg 15:42, 9 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Would be wonderful if someone wanted to write a biography of him; he was such an interesting person. Did you know that he was raised in a fundamentalist religious setting, a community of scriptural literalists who recognizing a singular boy genius among them, educated him and sent him forth into the world to disprove the heretical emergent theory of plate tectonics, which asserted that the earth was more than a few thousand years old. He began the project by amassing all available information into his brilliant brain, only to conclude that the evidence was overwhelmingly in favor of the theory. Thus he changed his entire world view, and decided to become the foremost world expert on the billions-of-years evolutions of planets -- which he did. He wrote the definitive books on the subject, and gains an endowed chair at the world's top institution as that expert. Amazing. So many stories... Openlander (talk) 20:36, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Openlander. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Godelproof.png listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Godelproof.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 12:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Openlander. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]