User talk:Opostylov

Pictures of the Past moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Pictures of the Past, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... discospinster _talk 18:57, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pictures of the Past has been accepted[edit]

Pictures of the Past, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

SL93 (talk) 20:55, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Otechestvennye Zapiski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Netochka Nezvanova. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 14[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maly Theatre (Moscow), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A Month in the Country.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 22[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Andrei Bely, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Symbolism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Autobiographies of Maxim Gorky does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Dl2000 (talk) 14:10, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 29[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aleksey Remizov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wishart.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gorky[edit]

Your comparison does not, I'm afraid, lend validity to those templates being in the main article. All the articles related to Anna Karenina, that template should be in the article for Anna Karenina, not the article for Tolstoy. It is no coincidence all those templates are from the same editor, and their only function in the main article is negative: they distract. Drmies (talk) 00:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 18[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chevengur, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ardis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ivan Kushchevsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nicholas I.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 4[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dnipro-1 Regiment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aydar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Move[edit]

How could you move the article without discussing it? It would be removed, FYI. --Egeymi (talk) 11:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit[edit]

Hello, you are marking nearly all of your edits as minor when a lot of them are certainly not, example [1]. You can read WP:MINOR on when you can mark an edit as such. Thanks. Mellk (talk) 16:21, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright[edit]

Hello Opostylov! Your additions to Gavril Myasnikov have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:43, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve The Oppermanns[edit]

Hello, Opostylov,

Thank you for creating The Oppermanns.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article contains long phrases (not under direct quotation) copied from copyrighted sources, particularly in the "Background" and "Plot" sections. Please rewrite the article in your own words as soon as possible. Unattributed and excessive close paraphrasing is a copyright violation. You can refer to the results of the copyvio detector for this article here. Particularly its similarities with the Deutsche Welle and New York Times sources (long phrases, nearly full sentences copied without direct quotes).

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bennv123}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bennv123 (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ruscism for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ruscism is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruscism (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:59, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]