User talk:Orlaw66

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orlaw66 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I logged in to find I have been blocked! This entire experience of building something on here is becoming unenjoyable. Is this a copyright issue? It says Abusive? Can you please explain! I'm a new contributer so please help me understand what article has been created thats at fault. Orlaw66 (talk) 16:09, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The technical evidence, according to TheresNoTime, indicates that you are either operating multiple accounts or are working closely with a number of other people. Further, the contributions of both your account and the other accounts linked to yours are consistent with undisclosed paid editing. In total, this suggests that you are not being honest with us. Declined. GeneralNotability (talk) 18:12, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VRTS ticket # 2021081110011378 related for anyone with access. Believe this was potentially appealed to ArbCom so ping Barkeep49. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 10:03, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]