User talk:Oskarg956

Welcome![edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Oskarg956, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Spellcast 19:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lead-in[edit]

Hi Oskarg, thanks for your message. There are several reasons why awards are usually best left for later in the intro:

WP:LEAD says "The first sentence in the lead section should be a concise definition of the topic". The main focus and topic of the article is the musician—not their awards. Winning awards is something they've done, but it's not what should be used to describe them from the start. With or without awards, they are musicians first and foremost.
You say it's seemingly bias to remove them in the first sentence. Consider the opposite: Let's say Pausini never won a Grammy but a Razzie instead (yes, I know she's not an actress but let's say she was). Would you consider "Laura Pausini is a Razzie-award winning actress" to be neutral? Aferall, it'd be true and she may be the first Italian to win one!
Nearly all those featured articles you gave mention awards later in the intro. Why is there such a need to repeat it in the first sentence? WP:NPOV#Fairness of tone states "Even when a topic is presented in terms of facts rather than opinion, an article can still radiate an implied stance through either selection of which facts to present, or more subtly their organization." When awards are presented in the first sentence (despite it already being said later in the intro), it's trying to cast the subject in a positive light.

I'm not making new arguments, I'm reiterating the points said in WT:NPOV#POV in first sentence?. Now User:FuriousFreddy said it's ok if the award was groundbreaking in some way. He gave Hattie McDaniel as an example because she was the first black actress to win an Oscar. I still disagree because she was an actress first and foremost. It's better to mention it later because you can specify which Oscar was won. When I started here, I remember adding "Grammy Award winning" on Pharrell despite it being said later in the intro. Looking back, I realised I had a positive POV of him (like "oh look, my favourite producer won a Grammy!"). Anyway, I see you've contributed to the NPOV talk page, so there will probably be more responses. There's also talk of adding this in WP:LEAD. Spellcast 19:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I can see why you think musicians have been targeted and not others. I edit mostly music articles, so I naturally come across "Grammy Award winning". But the same should apply for actors, athletes, authors, and other non-music biographies. Spellcast 16:30, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Sentidos opuestos al sol que mas calienta.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Sentidos opuestos al sol que mas calienta.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gustavo cerati ahi vamos reissue.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gustavo cerati ahi vamos reissue.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:52, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gustavo cerati ahi vamos.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Gustavo cerati ahi vamos.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:53, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Laura Pausini - La solitudine.ogg)[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Laura Pausini - La solitudine.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:14, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Laura pausini mi respuesta.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Laura pausini mi respuesta.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Las cosas que vives.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Las cosas que vives.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]