User talk:OttonielWhite

Isla Fisher[edit]

Hello. I wanted to ask you why you reverted my edit in Isla Fisher. Isla Fisher is Australian who is currently living in London. I am not sure why you reverted her nationality. I don't think describing her nationality needs to be sourced or anything. --Evanaeus (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fother Muckers[edit]

Hello OttonielWhite,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fother Muckers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Trivialist (talk) 02:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Wacky-penelope-pitstop.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wacky-penelope-pitstop.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of Wikipedia:Page Curation[edit]

Be careful not to tag articles with inappropriate speedy delete banners. A few times you have tagged articles as {{db-attack}} when there has been no attack to speak of (e.g. Ocean City Volunteer Fire Company MD and Heroes Tour (Kiss and Def Leppard)). ... discospinster _talk 23:46, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Elindiord, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Philip J Fry • (talk) 01:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OttonielWhite. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

I've reverted your unexplained reversion at Saoirse Ronan. Please use edit summaries to explain your edits. If you have an issue with the article, use the talk page. Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 10:40, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please use edit summaries. You may also wish to read this and this. "As Whoopi Goldberg put it in an interview with the paper: 'An actress can only play a woman. I'm an actor – I can play anything.'" Regards, Bastun^{Ėġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ!} 16:59, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notice[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Conifer (talk) 11:04, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 weeks for continued abuse of Twinkle. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Potential edit warring in When Marnie Was There[edit]

Hello, you're invited and express your views on Talk:When Marnie Was There#Edits reverted without adding summary. Jotamide (talk) 18:43, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OttonielWhite, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Conifer (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]