User talk:OwenBaines

Welcome!

Hello, OwenBaines, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Bot 6.0, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Eeekster (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bot 6.0[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bot 6.0, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Eeekster (talk) 00:22, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mouth ulcer, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 16:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This was not me. I have looked at the page and have not rmember ever visiting it OwenBaines (talk) 16:58, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See this diff. --Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 17:01, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at ImPlicitNgine, you may be blocked from editing. See this diff. Once an AfD discussion has been opened, no one except a closing admin may remove the AfD template. Alan the Roving Ambassador (talk) 17:03, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alan i have a Deleted Article that for deleted for the wrong interpretation and im wondering who to speak to? P.S i have check them and will stick with it eventhough i cant remember it OwenBaines (talk) 17:06, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

OwenBaines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

90.196.198.137 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Ideleteallarticles". The reason given for Ideleteallarticles's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

Blocking administrator: Jac16888 (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Same person, now directly blocked. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OwenBaines (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Once again, Wrongly blocked for an account i didnt not create. OwenBaines (talk) 2:15 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

A Checkuser has verified that your account is the same and you are both blanking. -- DQ (t) (e) 18:34, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am NOT accepting this. Once again i said i dont know what account that is and i demand unblocking or atleast a good reason. If i dont receive i will SUE wikipedia on charges. OwenBaines (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your access to your talk page has been revoked for fraud and legal threats. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:54, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]