User talk:PSOILFHJFHFDF

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PSOILFHJFHFDF! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jojhutton (talk) 17:40, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous

March 2011[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiptoety talk 17:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HUH?!!! Are you OK?!!--PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 17:46, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSOILFHJFHFDF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That is ridiculous! I nominated an article for deletion and then you blocked me indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. Now what should I think about your action? That article is clearly an spam and advertisement. It lacks notability and references. The fact that you have blocked me only makes me think that you are doing this because you want to save that article from deletion at all costs. PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 18:43, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address your abuse of multiple accounts.  Sandstein  20:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checking the log, it says "Disruptive editing: Along with logging out to engage in an edit war." Based on your abuse of multiple accounts (see this admission, for starters), there are grounds for the block on the basis of prevention of future abuse.

If you agree that you have abused multiple accounts in the past, and if you agree not to do so in the future, then I'm willing to move onto the underlying concern of disruptive editing. —C.Fred (talk) 18:50, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I had no other options. Because the blocking admin sounded hostile to me and I thought he wanted to protect the spam article by blocking me. I haven't made any socks before he blocked me. Of course if you unblock me, I won't create any socks, because I won't need any! Why should I create socks if I can edit with my account?--PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 18:53, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like the edit in question was made without logging in rather than after creating another account. Looking deeper at that article's history, though, raises the question of whether this account exists only to carry over harassment from another language's Wikipedia. I need to consult with the blocking admin before I can do anything further. —C.Fred (talk) 19:34, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's my IP. I forgot to login. So what? Did I make any wrong edits? Was that edit disruptive? I don't think you need to do any in-depth analysis of people's psychological behavior to discover why do people nominate articles for deletion! Just tell me if I ever made any disruptive (i.e. vandalism etc...) edits or not?--PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 19:39, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PSOILFHJFHFDF (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hallo Sandstein. Können Sie eigentlich Englisch lesen? Ich glaube nicht! Bitte stören Sie nicht, wenn Sie nichts von der Geschichte wissen. Vielen Dank für Ihr Verständis. :-)) --PSOILFHJFHFDF (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Very tempted to answer in German, but we are supposed to communicate in English around here. If you make another disruptive request like this one, I'll revoke your talk page access. Favonian (talk) 21:54, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PSOILFHJFHFDF for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 17:50, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PSOILFHJFHFDF&oldid=1143213806"