User talk:Pa30T

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. --Wiggling Piggy (talk) 12:34, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at Donbas Battalion shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kleuske (talk) 12:48, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.   Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:44, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alert[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in Eastern Europe. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Salvio Let's talk about it! 14:48, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taras Kostanchuk (November 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by K.e.coffman were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pa30T! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Information icon Hello, Pa30T. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Taras Kostanchuk, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:01, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@K.e.coffman: Hello, K.e.coffman! Conflict of interests on the page is impossible. I am not personally acquainted with Taras Kostanchuk (commander of the assault group of the Donbas Battalion), was never part of the Donbas Battalion. Taras Kostanchuk is a war hero and now even make a film about him (as he survived in the Battle of Ilovaisk). Now he is active in supporting the military and a lot of many other public projects. I could attach a large number of links mentioning him, but it will be easier for you to register his name on the search engine. You will see that people are looking for his biography. This is the reason to have a full-fledged biography in one place, so I create this page. I hope you check this information and change your opinion. Best regards, Pa30T (talk) 06:53, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your Teahouse edit[edit]

Hi Pa30T, if you want to reply to a section that has been archived at Wikipedia:Teahouse, please start a new section on the Teahouse page instead of attempting to restore the archived section. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 13:27, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Taras Kostanchuk has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Taras Kostanchuk. Thanks! Legacypac (talk) 12:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taras Kostanchuk (April 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shemtovca was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Shemtovca (talk) 16:56, 8 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Taras Kostanchuk has been accepted[edit]

Taras Kostanchuk, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 05:18, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]