User talk:Page Representative

Welcome![edit]

Hi Page Representative! I noticed your contributions to Saraiki language and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 331dot (talk) 09:30, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summaries are very inaccurate. This edit did a lot more than correct punctuation. Please make sure you edit summaries are accurate. Thanks 331dot (talk) 09:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Page Representative, I would highly recommend a careful read of Wikpedia's fundamental policy on verifiability: Wikipedia:Verifiability. Also, before making substantial changes to major articles (like those of the bigger languages of Pakistan), it's worth having a look at the articles' talk pages (and their archives), as an article's current wording often represents consensus achieved in past discussions. – Uanfala (talk) 11:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Uanfala. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Thali dialect, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Uanfala (talk) 16:45, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Thali dialect, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Uanfala (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Saraiki language, you may be blocked from editing. – Uanfala (talk) 17:44, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Bhakkar District. – Uanfala (talk) 18:00, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How is my material with out any source and why are you doing unsuccessful editings yourself. Language of Bhakkar is Thalochi due named to Thal Desert. Who are you to provide wrong information. Page Representative (talk) 18:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent you from persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure whether you are willfully ignoring the messages above regarding the requirement for sourcing, or if you are unaware of how a talk page works. Please take the next 24 hours to review the information that has been provided to you here and ensure that you include the requisite reliable sources when adding or changing information in articles once the block expires.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:05, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please do not mark your edits as minor. They are not. See Help:Minor edit.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:07, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And this is not "punctuation correction".-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Page Representative (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I edited content for accuracy. Content that was provided in these articles was fictitous. Even You can compare content of these article with those numberous articles that have the same topics but correct information. This is my error that I mistakenly describe the reason "Punctuation" Next time I will describe the detailed reason. Information corrected by me was completely genuine. I hope that Wikipedia after getting view of it unblock me. Page Representative (talk) 18:17, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't address your uncited changes and does not address your edit warring. Yamla (talk) 20:10, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Disambiguation pages[edit]

Please do not add extended text to disambiguation pages, as you did at Abbasi. Disambiguation pages are just an index of the articles using that term.
Furthermore, on disambiguation pages, only include one blue-link per line - as explained at WP:DDD - Thank you - Arjayay (talk) 12:03, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Sir. Page Representative (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Sitush. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Ranghar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 09:45, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Ranghar. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:53, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have previously been blocked for repeatedly adding unsourced or improperly sourced content, and you are now edit warring to insert material without a source and/or whose sourcing has been challenged. When you make edits that are contested, you must seek consensus for their inclusion by discussion on the talk page, *not* edit war to try to force them in. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:56, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abassi[edit]

Please note that disambiguation pages like Abassi are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry that mentions the title being disambiguated
Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references - Wikipedia is not a business directory

When Kakkay Abbasi is moved to main space, it can be added to Abassi.

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 15:10, 1 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COI username notice[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Page Representative", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakkay Abbasi (January 1)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Kakkay Abbasi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Page Representative! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:17, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Kakkay Abbasi has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Kakkay Abbasi. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 23:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kakkay Abbasi (January 2)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Curbon7 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Curbon7 (talk) 10:16, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sir guide me regarding publication of this article Page Representative (talk) 15:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kakkay Abbasi, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Greyjoy^talk 09:38, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You can better see the matter. In one of recent discussion few editors involved personally. You have authority to judge the things. Investigate I will be obedient to decision. Page Representative (talk) 10:51, 5 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ropari Sheikhs[edit]

Hello, Page Representative. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ropari Sheikhs, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]