User talk:Pagoprima

Hello, Pagoprima, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Dloh cierekim 15:15, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Speedy deletion nomination of Breil (company)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Breil (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 15:24, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Instead, I've simply changed it to a redirect to Binda Group, joining Breil Milano and Breil Tribe. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:06, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pagoprima. You have new messages at Shawn in Montreal's talk page.
Message added 16:11, 4 September 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Breil may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[Breil (company)], watches, jewelry and fragrance brands of the [[Binda Group]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:12, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikilinking[edit]

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

dates
years
commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This even applies for infoboxes.

Thanks and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 10:21, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

infatti[edit]

sono talmente ovvie le ragioni che tu esponi da risultare persino banali quindi comprensibili pure a chi non conosce certi argomenti: infatti sono intenzionato a non occuparmi di tali discussioni per impiegare il mio tempo allo sviluppo degli articoli. Ricambio i complimenti a te per il tuo apporto al progetto e apprezzo la tua disponibilità verso di me. Ciao e alla prossima--Puccetto (talk) 16:17, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Breil (company) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Breil (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breil (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 12:34, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

rieccolo[edit]

il solito personaggio s'è fatto vivo pure con te: possiamo organizzare una petizione per metterlo in condizione di non far danno? Ma che problemi ha? Mi sta facendo perdere tanto tempo inutilmente.--Puccetto (talk) 16:30, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No offense intended[edit]

Dear Pagoprima, just to avoid misunderstandings: I don't attack articles for fun or because of frustration. Neither I, neither anyone else finds it fun to have an article named as "Article for deletion", but sometimes there are reasons for it. Articles should be based on "hard" knowledge and written in an encyclopaedic style, that is simply the concept of Wikipedia. When writing an article about fashion, whenever the product is praised it is best to give a reference, or else to omit this part I think. In doing so, it becomes less likely that an article is named for deletion (or deleted). Anyway, good luck in the further writing and editing of articles! Regards, Kareldorado (talk) 20:27, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: In the meanwhile I put a striketrough over my AfD comment on the Breil article as you corrected for it.

Fonte delle informazioni sull'utile Breil[edit]

La fonte delle informazioni sull'utile Breil è questa, dice 180 milioni fatturato totale del gruppo Binda di cui I 2 terzi(ossia 120 milioni) sono generati dal marchio Breil. Mi sembra attendibile e verosimile, non sono però riuscio a trovare ulteriori conferme. Silvio_Marano (talk) 20:27, 26 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]