User talk:Pakhtakorienne

Welcome!

Hello, Pakhtakorienne, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! VanTucky ^talk 19:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

regarding edits to Commonwealth of Independent States Cup[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. VanTucky ^talk 19:29, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LEN Euroleague 2009-10[edit]

Hello. Because I don't know the coloring custom on en.wikipedia, I put a message on your page. Perhaps, could it be useful to color in blue (?) the third in each A-D group because these clubs are saved to the first qualification round of the LEN Cup? What do you think? Sebjarod (talk) 07:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course, I didn't know that. I'll see what I can do. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 09:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am discovering the rules for fr.wikinews. The source I found (plus the news sources) is a LEN rules for European club cups (pdf). Sebjarod (talk) 10:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Women's football task force[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Speedy deletion nomination of Liis Emajõe[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Liis Emajõe requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sander Säde 20:45, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

refs[edit]

FYI... When doing a <ref> tag. It comes after the punctuation and not before...

.<ref> and not <ref>.

Bgwhite (talk) 07:27, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marina Saenko[edit]

Greetings Pakhtakorienne, Just wanted to let you know that I saw that you created the new article Marina Saenko--The content seems well-organized.However, I noticed there are some holes that may need filling: the references in the article do not follow Wikipedia guidelines. There is a tutorial on formatting citations at Wikipedia:Referencing. It's nice to see you editing!Jipinghe (talk) 18:05, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some tips for you![edit]

Hi Pakhtakorienne, I thought I'd drop a few notes on your talk page with some help on writing articles :o)

First of all, it may be best for you to do a bit of reading, starting with the Wikipedia manual of style, which will give you a lot of information about how Wikipedia prefers its articles to be written. It's not as hard to follow as it might look; quite a bit of the information there probably won't be vital for you at first.

Second, I recommend you make a user sandbox - which is just an area you can use to practise in, and to make notes in, and to get things ready in. If you click this red link: user:Pakhtakorienne/Sandbox, that will let you create that page (it gives you an edit window to start work in). Anything, anywhere, on the help and information pages which gives you an example, try it out in your sandbox until you're familiar with it.

For your article, the next thing you want to do is start collecting as much information as you can about it. Google searches (particularly in Books and Scholar) will be your best friend for this! Once you've found the information, the next most important thing is to start writing up each fact in your own words (very important, this), and make a note at the same time of exactly where that information came from. Build in the references as you go along; I'm going to copy in, down below this, a whole heap of help on doing references, which was produced by one of our best teachers (Chzz).

Here's another place that you'll find incredibly useful - citation templates which you can copy and paste into your sandbox, between <ref></ref> tags; you just fill in the blanks from your sources into the template, and you'll end up with nicely formatted inline citations :o) It all helps. Remember to add a references section to your sandbox (make a new line, and put ==References== on it, and type {{reflist}} on the next line, so that you can see how your citations look as you do them. Remember to save your page often! You don't want to lose your work.

Hopefully this will give you a good start and make life easier for you. Pesky (talk …stalk!) 10:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

How references work[edit]

Simple references[edit]

These require two parts;

a)

Chzz is 98 years old.<ref> "The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. </ref>

He likes tea. <ref> [http://www.nicecupofteaandasitdown.com Tea website] </ref>

b) A section called "References" with the special code "{{reflist}}";

== References ==
{{reflist}}

(an existing article is likely to already have one of these sections)

To see the result of that, please look at user:chzz/demo/simpleref. Edit it, and check the code; perhaps make a test page of your own, such as user:Pakhtakorienne/reftest and try it out.

Named references[edit]

Chzz was born in 1837. <ref name=MyBook>
"The book of Chzz", Aardvark Books, 2009. 
</ref> 

Chzz lives in Footown.<ref name=MyBook/>

Note that the second usage has a / (and no closing ref tag). This needs a reference section as above; please see user:chzz/demo/namedref to see the result.

Citation templates[edit]

You can put anything you like between <ref> and </ref>, but using citation templates makes for a neat, consistent look;

Chzz has 37 Olympic medals. <ref> {{Citation
 | last = Smith
 | first = John
 | title = Olympic medal winners of the 20th century
 | publication-date = 2001
 | publisher = [[Cambridge University Press]]
 | page = 125
 | isbn = 0-521-37169-4
}}
</ref>

Please see user:chzz/demo/citeref to see the result.

For more help and tips on that subject, see user:chzz/help/refs.

Something to make your life easier![edit]

Hi there Pakhtakorienne! I've just come across one of your articles, and noticed that you had to create titles for your url links manually, or were using bare urls as references.

You might want to consider using this tool - it makes your life a whole heap easier, by filling in complete citation templates for your links. All you do is install the script on Special:MyPage/common.js, or or Special:MyPage/vector.js, then paste the bare url (without [...] brackets) between your <ref></ref> tabs, and you'll find a clickable link called Reflinks in your toolbox section of the page (probably in the left hand column). Then click that tool. It does all the rest of the work (provided that you remember to save the page! It doesn't work for everything (particularly often not for pdf documents), but for pretty much anything ending in "htm" or "html" (and with a title) it will do really, really well. Happy editing! Pesky (talk …stalk!) 10:34, 18 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

English Refs Please![edit]

Please include references in English to Joana Montouto. All refs are in Spanish. Thanks! Go Phightins! (talk) 23:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I translated the headlines to English. Is it okay now? Pakhtakorienne (talk) 01:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Go Phightins! (talk) 03:09, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Esther Sullastres[edit]

The article Esther Sullastres has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this player has played a full competitive match per WP:FOOTYN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 12:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sullastres plays in the Spanish First Division, the top category in the league of the 10th ranked European WNT, as shown in the first reference. In addition she has played a full UEFA-sanctioned official qualifying match for the 2012 UEFA Women's U-19 Championship, a notable international event, as shown in the second reference.

I realize the Spanish women's top division is not a fully professional league, but there should be different standards for men's and women's football considering in male football's most leagues are fully professional while in women's football it's just a few; in the context of international women's football the Spanish league is at least as notable as the Gambrinus liga in men's. If we only recognize players from fully professional leagues we would only have Bundesliga, WPS and Damallsvenskan players, which means ignoring 99% of top level women's football, which is shown just as competitive in competitions such as the Women's World Cup. By not considering the players from prominent semi-professional European women's leagues such as France, Italy and Spain's suitable for the website Wikipedia would be approving of discrimination in sports. I think Wikipedia has to address this matter. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 15:15, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

New football articles[edit]

Hi there - whenever you create a new article on football, please make sure you add {{WikiProject Football}} to the article talk page; please also list them at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/New articles if you can. This is just so we know what new articles there are, so that we can help improve them! Please let me know if you need any help. Thanks, Giant Snowman 17:05, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Football Barnstar
		For your tireless work on women's football articles. I wanted you to know that your efforts had not gone unnoticed! Clavdia chauchat (talk) 20:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, thanks! :) Pakhtakorienne (talk) 22:32, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ksenia Veselukha[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ksenia Veselukha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. LegacyOfValor (talk) 08:37, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Maren Knudsen‎[edit]

The article Maren Knudsen‎ has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

As this bot-message is telling you, I've PROD'ed Marie Knudsen. I've also PROD'ed Melissa Bjånesøy and Cathrine Dekkerhus. Why? Simple because they are not notable. Of the four articles I found that you made on Norwegian female footballers, three are not notable, so I'm wondering - Are you familiar with the notability guidelines? Would be a shame to browse through your 650 created articles just to have half of them deleted. Mentoz86 (talk) 02:38, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

While it's not a fully professional league, the Norwegian Toppserien is one of the top women's football leagues in the world, with two teams eligible for the UEFA Women's Champions League, which is arguably the premier international club women's competition worldwide. Unlike the men's modality, women's football is basically an amateur sport, and restricting notability to senior internationals and WPS (which might disappear for good) players means missing a 90% of the picture to say the least. Do you really think a random Maltese international is more notable than a noted Toppserien player? As a sport with the same official recognition of men's footbll but different worldwide status and standards, I think women's football should have notability guidelines of its own. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 03:47, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have some good points, but Wikipedia isn't about personal opinions. While you could argue that women should have other notability criterias then men, you also have another notability criteria which could be taken into account (WP:GNG). And these three footballers does not pass GNG in my opinion. I don't believe these are less notable then a maltese international, but that's unfortunately how the notability criteria are. On the hand, a non-international player in Toppserien receives less media-coverage in Norway then any non-notable player in Adeccoligaen (men's second tier) and playing in Adeccoligaen does not make you notable either.

If my understanding of the criteria are correct, women footballer have a less strict criteria for an article then other amateur-sports, where only participation in a World championship or the Olympic is enough. But you should remove the PROD-banner from the articles, and I'll take them to AfD which might lead to a wider consensus on this (if there isn't one already), like, for instance, participating in UEFA Womens Champions League makes you notable. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the AfD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maren Knudsen

A barnstar for you![edit]

		Football (soccer) barnstar
		Updating women's soccer articles (like the 2012 Algarve Cup) is a thankless job. Let me be the first to say, thank you for expanding our coverage to give the women who suit up for their country the respect they deserve, as well. Achowat (talk) 18:41, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image for your article[edit]

Hi Pakhtakorienne, I would like to let you know that I've just uploaded an image for an article you created, Iva Mocová. Thanks for all your hard work! - Cloudz 679 18:56, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kinef Kirishi[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kinef Kirishi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ncboy2010 (talk) 19:42, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Autopatrolled[edit]

Ever thought about requesting autopatrolled rights? Wikipedia:Autopatrolled tells you how to do that. It saves the New Page Patrollers a lot of work when your, rather large, production is exempt from checking as new page. The quality of your articles is good enough. Night of the Big Wind _talk 17:20, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

wikilinking[edit]

Hi, I noticed you retained links to years and dates in Anne-Marie Bănuţă. Please note that this is not normally done on en.WP. Thanks. $Tony (talk)$ 05:54, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have linked dates and years. You should not do that. Night of the Big Wind _talk 14:32, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be okay changing "made her debut on 31 March 2012" for "made her debut in 2012"? Pakhtakorienne (talk) 14:41, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your original text was made her debut on [[31 March]] [[2012]]. Replacing that by made her debut on 31 March 2012, without the link, is good enough. Just do not link the date and year. Night of the Big Wind _talk 17:24, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I get it now Pakhtakorienne (talk) 18:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:L estartit.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:L estartit.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:39, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled[edit]

Hey; I've given you the "autopatrolled" userright to signify that your articles are of high quality, to the point where they don't need review :). Keep up the good work! Ironholds (talk) 17:55, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:ASDCF Riviera di Romagna logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:ASDCF Riviera di Romagna logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:05, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrine Tomter[edit]

The article Andrine Tomter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

article about a promising female footballer who fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 15:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anette Tengesdal[edit]

The article Anette Tengesdal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a promising female footballer who fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:39, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Los Angeles Philharmonic[edit]

Hello, I'm Waldhorn. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Los Angeles Philharmonic, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Could you include citations to avoid removal? If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Waldhorn (talk) 23:10, 21 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

NWSL[edit]

I would like to request your support in this discussion re: the professional status of the National Women's Soccer League and inclusion on this page: Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Fully professional leagues. Thank you for your consideration. Hmlarson (talk) 01:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of ISCM World Music Days[edit]

The article ISCM World Music Days has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:V: no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:Pro Recco logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Pro Recco logo.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:Pro Recco logo.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 21:55, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:CN Catalunya logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:CN Catalunya logo.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:CN Catalunya logo.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 09:51, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:CN Posillipo logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:CN Posillipo logo.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:CN Posillipo logo.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 14:28, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free file File:NC Vouliagmeni logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:NC Vouliagmeni logo.jpg. The file is currently tagged as non-free and has been identified as possibly not being in compliance with the non-free content policy. For specific information on the problems with the file and how they can be fixed, please check the message at File:NC Vouliagmeni logo.jpg. For further questions and comments, please use the non-free content review page. Thank you. -- Toshio Yamaguchi 21:46, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you[edit]

		The Women's Football Barnstar
		Thank you for your work on Wikipedia articles related to women's football. :) Hmlarson (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emilia Appelqvist[edit]

The article Emilia Appelqvist has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appelqvist has never played in a fully pro league or represented Sweden at senior level and fails WP:NFOOTY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 09:11, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Appelqvist is an important player in a contender for the next UEFA Women's Champions League title, which should be as notable as playing in a fully professional league. And she's playing in one of the top women's football leagues in the world, it's not like she's playing in the Latvian league (no offence). I understand this might be deleted, but I think it's unfair, you shouldn't use men's football standards to judge women's football. Anyway, I'd rather have it discussed so I'm removing the tag. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 09:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any reliable sources that support your claim that she is an important player for the team, or that the team is a contender for the next UEFA Women's Champions League title, or is it just your personal opinion? I am not using men's standard for women's football, if I were I would presume that players that have played in the Swedish top-tier league would be notable. What is important here, is not the football specific guideline, it is the general notability guideline, and if you have any reliable sources (independent of the subject) that describes Appelqvist as "an important player in a contender for the next UEFA Women's Champions League title", she would probably pass that guideline and I wont have to open an AfD. My experience with Scandinavian football, is that women's footballers rarely receives enough coverage to pass GNG before they are capped at the national team, and my searches indicate that it's the same way with Appelqvist. Mentoz86 (talk) 18:26, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of principal conductors by orchestra[edit]

The article List of principal conductors by orchestra has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Out-of-date and incomplete.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Klein zach 08:10, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Spain squad 2004 UEFA Women's Under-19 Championship[edit]

Template:Spain squad 2004 UEFA Women's Under-19 Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C 679 07:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Switzerland Squad 2009 Women's Euro U-19[edit]

Template:Switzerland Squad 2009 Women's Euro U-19 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C 679 07:31, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Emilia Appelqvist for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emilia Appelqvist is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emilia Appelqvist until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mentoz86 (talk) 11:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lisanne Schaareman[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lisanne Schaareman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mentoz86 (talk) 16:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Si Shut Hau[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Si Shut Hau requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mentoz86 (talk) 17:08, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Norwegian women’s football leagues[edit]

Have a look at Category:Women's football leagues in Norway; should it and others like it in Europe be deleted/upmerged? Hugo999 (talk) 11:20, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Honorine Corbel[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Honorine Corbel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:21, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles. I thought I'd let you know about the Women's Football/Soccer Task Force (WP:WOSO), a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women's football/soccer. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Members page. Thanks!

Hmlarson (talk) 04:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Giovana dos Santos Floriano[edit]

The article Giovana dos Santos Floriano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is about a women's footballer that fails WP:GNG due to lack of in-depth coverage, and that fails WP:NFOOTY as she hasn't represented her country at senior level.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 08:29, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stop with the tournament articles[edit]

You are creating the tournament articles wrong. Stop with the template programming elements. You are doing articles and not templates. They are not allowed in articles. I keep removing them and you keep creating them. No more {{{RD3-team02| ... }}} stuff. Bgwhite (talk) 06:18, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand, all FIFA World Cup, Olympic tournaments, Eurobasket, UEFA Champions League... articles have brackets for the results. Or are you saying I should make them some other way? Is RD3-team02= acceptable? Pakhtakorienne (talk) 11:20, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't. Not one of them use template programming elements. Careful, you are getting some things confused. Look carefully at the differences. I'm specifically talking about: {{{RD3-team02| value }}}. Please note the {{{RD3-team02| and its brackets. This is computer code for a variable which never is used in any of the articles and never should be.

Look at 2012–13 UEFA Champions League It is not doing what you are doing. You are creating a table. UEFA has everything inside a template. If there is a template similar to UEFA's that you can use for your articles, then use templates first. It will save you time and makes things easier to understand what is going on. Bgwhite (talk) 18:39, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I meant bracket as in 32 team bracket, not as { }. So this is acceptable, right? 1983–84 IHF Women's Cup Winners' Cup. Since yesterday I have been doing it like this, and it certainly is easier and faster. Sorry for the trouble, anyway.

By the way, there seems to be something wrong with the 32 Team Bracket 2 legs template, the finalists don't appear in their boxes. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 18:52, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I responded to your Teahouse question. I was hoping User:Digirami would respond, but if this person doesn't post there, ask at User talk:Digirami.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 20:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Pakhtakorienne, 1983–84 IHF Women's Cup Winners' Cup looks good. It is no trouble at all... There are thousands of things to learn around here and we can't learn them all. Bgwhite (talk) 21:28, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It actually doesn't. The text of the article does not match its title.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 14:09, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think I fixed it, but if that wasn't what you wanted ... well, you know more about this stuff than I do.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 14:13, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the fix, Vchimpanzee. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 14:26, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marina Kiskonen[edit]

The article Marina Kiskonen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:GNG as she hasn't represented her country at senior level, or received significant coverage in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mentoz86 (talk) 07:42, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have also PROD'ed the following Russian footballers for the same reason: Svetlana Baikina, Kristina Chichkala, Anna Cholovyaga, Nana Gelbakhiani, Nadezhda Koltakova, Elena Schegaleva, Olga Svinukhova, Olesya Truntaeva and Ksenia Veselukha. If you think I've done a mistake with one of those, feel free to remove the PROD-tag. Cheers, Mentoz86 (talk) 08:09, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Russian women's football league is professional: Spain will complete for a spot in the UEFA Women's Euro 2013's quarterfinals against Russia, a country with the same handicap of Spain, the low number of licences, but where teams have much higher budgets and players are professionals. (Diario AS, 18 July 2013). [1].

Here Spanish international Verónica Boquete also says it's a professional championship: Russia is another world, it has a professional women's league, which means Russian players can make a life from football and they grow knowing they have future right there. [2]

Anyway I think playing the UEFA Women's Champions League should be enough since it's the most important competition in European women's football. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 14:37, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Those two sources are quite interesting I thought no women's league were fully pro, but if your translation is correct this list should be added to WP:FPL. That playing in the UEFA Women's Champions League should be enough to confer notability, is only your personal opinion - if you want to change the notability guideline, you should start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). Mentoz86 (talk) 08:29, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cindy Thomas[edit]

The article Cindy Thomas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 23:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:HK Slávia Partizánske logo.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HK Slávia Partizánske logo.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year![edit]

Happy New Year from the
Women's Football Task Force!

Thank you for your contributions to women's football/soccer articles throughout the year. 2014 is looking bright! We're glad to have you as a contributing member of the

Women's Football Task Force and hope to see more of your great work in the new year. Cheers!

Task force quick links

Open Tasks | Recognized content | Members | Resources
New! Portal:Women's association football

Orphaned non-free image File:RK Lokomotiva logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:RK Lokomotiva logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cyprus Cup-related article up for deletion[edit]

2013 Cyprus Cup squads, an article that you previously contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Please share your thoughts on the matter at this article's entry on the Articles for deletion page. Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 18:40, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Sporting Plaza de Argel logo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Sporting Plaza de Argel logo.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:05, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CB Conquero logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CB Conquero logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:01, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hørsholm 79'ers logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hørsholm 79'ers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:21, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

From it.wiki[edit]

Hi, can you suggest me an interwiki joint work on women's football articles?--Threecharlie (talk) 23:53, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1995 Algarve Cup[edit]

Hello Pakhtakorienne. Can you tell me the source of these edits in 2012? Kind regards, --Jakob Gottfried (talk) 12:45, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1952 in music may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|}
**''[[Sinfonia antartica]]'' (Symphony No. 7)]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1958 in music may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

oup.com/us/companion.websites/9780199919994/pdf/Hess_Figures_Chapter_6.pdf Oxford University Press]]</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:50, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1957 in music may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

203%20sydney%201957&f=false The Australian Symphony from Federation to 1960]</ref> <ref>[http://www.worldcat.org/title/symphony-no-3-in-c-minor/oclc/221541885</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great work![edit]

		The Sport Barnstar
		Thanks for all of your diligent work on articles related to women's soccer/football. It's very much appreciated! Hmlarson (talk) 21:24, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women's soccer categories[edit]

Hi, thanks for your work adding women's football position categories. One thing though - could you make sure to remove the parent category when you add the women's category? For example, a player shouldn't be in both Category:Association football goalkeepers and Category:Women's association football goalkeepers, since being in the latter category automatically makes puts you in the former. Thanks. Mosmof (talk) 19:27, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I didn't do it because I didn't know it that would be okay. Pakhtakorienne (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sara Labiano[edit]

The article Sara Labiano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this footballer meets WP:GNG or has played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 17:39, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marianela Szymanowski for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marianela Szymanowski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marianela Szymanowski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joeykai (talk) 06:05, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:RCD Espanyol women squad[edit]

Template:RCD Espanyol women squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Sorry about this because I admire your work on women's football articles, but this template is no longer serving its purpose. I promise to bring it back when it has some more blue links. Bring back Daz Sampson (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:DKSK Miskolc logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DKSK Miskolc logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:DKSK Miskolc logo.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:DKSK Miskolc logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:23, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Orvosegyetem SC logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Orvosegyetem SC logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you + invitation[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to women in sports!

We'd like to invite you to learn more about Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of women in sports. If you would like to participate, join by visiting the Participants page or visit one of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Women's sport/Task forces for specific sports. Thanks!

Hmlarson (talk) 03:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gijon FF logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gijon FF logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CD Oroquieta Villaverde logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CD Oroquieta Villaverde logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CN Barcelona logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CN Barcelona logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:17, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ExtremaduraFemeninoCF.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ExtremaduraFemeninoCF.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:34, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

European competitions[edit]

Hi, before adding to the main club article, check to see if they already have a sub page such as Juventus F.C. in European football, or create the sub page, those lists warrant its own article. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 02:17, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Those sub pages are linked in the main article within a summary section. This chart allows a visual scope on the club's progression at the European level throughout its history you can't get from the table in Juventus F.C. in European football, so I believe it's useful at the main page. Can I repost it with a "main" template linking to Juventus F.C. in European football for the full info before the deletion gets unrevisable? Pakhtakorienne (talk) 11:19, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to ask at WT:FOOTY. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 13:05, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 24[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Swedish women's football clubs in international competitions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maria Karlsson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

English women's football clubs in international competitions

added a link pointing to West Midlands

Russian women's football clubs in international competitions

added a link pointing to Samara

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dynamo Kursk logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dynamo Kursk logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:12, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red online editathon on sports[edit]

		Welcome to Women in Red's May 2017 worldwide online editathon. Participation is welcome in any language.
		"Sports"

(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list) --Ipigott (talk) 13:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An invitation for you[edit]

Please join us during the month of May 2017 for the...
Women's Sports worldwide online edit-a-thon
	Contributions to new or existing articles on women athletes (including WOSO players) are encouraged and appreciated. For more information and resources, please see WP: Women in Red, the Women's football task force and WP:Women's Sport. `#wikiwomeninred`

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) (Delivered: 16:40, 30 April 2017 (UTC))

Orphaned non-free image File:Girona CH logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Girona CH logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:17, 4 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CE Noia logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CE Noia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:10, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2016–17 FC Bayern Munich Frauen season[edit]

Hi, Pakhtakorienne. I have userfied the article 2016–17 FC Bayern Munich Frauen season while it is being discussed and/or improved. It can be found at User:Pakhtakorienne/2016–17 FC Bayern Munich Frauen season. Cheers. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:57, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Showteam table[edit]

I've decided to insert the league table into a template for making easier to insert it in several articles (team seasons, Spanish football season, etc.). I don't know why your comment supposes a problem but, anyway, there would be the possibility to insert all the text about qualifications in a "Nowrap" template. I disagree, but that's an option. Asturkian (talk) 10:05, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I offer you this option, with the new module for league tables and respecting colors.

Pos	Team v t e	Pld	W	D	L	GF	GA	GD	Pts	Qualification or relegation
2	FC Barcelona	30	24	5	1	98	12	+86	77	Qualification for UEFA Champions League and Copa de la Reina
3	Atlético Madrid	30	22	3	5	83	24	+59	69	Qualification for Copa de la Reina
4	Levante UD	30	16	6	8	56	38	+18	54
5	Real Sociedad	30	16	5	9	50	33	+17	53
6	Valencia CF	30	15	4	11	65	30	+35	49

Updated to match(es) played on 12 June 2016. Source: soccerway.com
Rules for classification: 1) points; 2) head-to-head points; 3) goal difference; 4) number of goals scored

Greetings. Asturkian (talk) 10:09, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Pakhtakorienne (talk) 10:12, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Subject of mass mailing: Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: August 2017

Should the women's football task force become WikiProject: WOSO?

According to an op-ed in the recent Signpost, some editors think task forces and subgroups are dying in 2017.

What do you think about forming our own WikiProject separate from WP:FOOTY? There's an on-going discussion of the potential pros and cons on the task force talk page. Input is welcome.

Recent developments

New initiatives have been created for:

FA WSL (England's top-division league)
NCAA (American university teams, conferences, etc.)
W-League (Australia's top-division league)

Ongoing tournaments

UEFA Women's Euro 2017 (July 16 – August 6, 2017)
- UEFA Women's Euro 2017 Final (August 6, 2017)
2017 Tournament of Nations (July 27– August 3, 2017)

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

2017 National Women's Soccer League season (United States) ongoing
2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season (Mexico) ongoing
2017–18 W-League (Australia) starts in Sept.
2017–18 FA WSL (England) starts in Sept.
2017–18 Division 1 Féminine (France) starts in Sept.
2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga (Germany) starts in Sept.
2017–18 Indian Women's League season (India) starts in Oct.

Did you know?

While WP:FPL lists only two women's top-division leagues as notable due to its "fully professional" criteria, did you know you can create an article on any player in any league as long as the references meet WP:GNG guidelines? Make sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}.

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks page if you'd like and other editors may be able to help. Need tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors? Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

(To subscribe, Women's football task force/Invite list. Unsubscribe, Women's football task force/Opt-out list) – Hmlarson (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

Invitation to edit with Women in Red[edit]

		Thank you for creating several articles on women and their works over the past couple of months. We have become aware of your contributions thanks to research undertaken by Bobo.03 at the University of Minnesota. You might be interested in becoming a member of our WikiProject Women in Red where we are actively trying to reduce Wikipedia's content gender gap. If you would just like to receive messages about our activities without becoming a member, you can simply add your name to our mailing list. If you would prefer to not receive additional notices of our monthly activities, you can let us know on our opt-out list. In any case, thank you for actively contributing to the coverage of women (currently, 17.09% of English Wikipedia's biographies). Happening in September: Hispanic and Latina women Women in the Olympics Women from New Zealand #1day1woman Global Initiative
		(To subscribe: Women in Red/English language mailing list and Women in Red/international list. Unsubscribe: Women in Red/Opt-out list)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited German women's football clubs in international competitions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pernille Harder (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Celta de Vigo Baloncesto logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Celta de Vigo Baloncesto logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Santa Teresa CD seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ana González (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:33, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Levante UD Femenino seasons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kalush and Rosa Castillo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

List of INAC Kobe Leonessa seasons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Iga

List of Sporting de Huelva seasons (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Ana Rodríguez

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 10[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of INAC Kobe Leonessa seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar for you[edit]

		Moves like Kim Little Barnstar
		As a recipient of the Kim Little barnstar, we'd like to thank you for make amazing Kim Little-like contributions to articles related to women's football (soccer) and WP:WOSO. Thank you for your diligent work!

Hmlarson (talk) 01:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Primera division timelines[edit]

Don't you think these high number of timelines look clumsy in the article? I don't think they belong in the main league article at all. -Koppapa (talk) 10:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I moved them to List of women's football clubs in Spain. Is that okay? Pakhtakorienne (talk) 11:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 25[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Tyresö FF seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caroline Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Pannonia Cup[edit]

The article Pannonia Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-verifiable competition. Google search gives zero results.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 17:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Zaragoza CFF seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carolina Miranda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 23[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of FC Barcelona seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adama Traoré (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WOSO Task Force News: April 2018[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: April 2018

Eniola Aluko of England (in white) and Jovana Mrkić (in red) of Montenegro, 2014

Hello WOSO editors! A few initiatives have been started with an emphasis on making more WOSO links blue (similar to the work that WikiProject Women in Red does) and filling in the gaps within various league, team, and player, etc. articles.

If you're interested in collaborating with others to make more links blue, take a look at the initiatives listed in the box below. Sign up at the bottom of an initiative page and help grow the lists, add potential references, resources, and create the articles ... or create your own initiative.

Did you know ...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in 1 active women's league)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

Czech Republic: 2017–18 Czech First Division ends Apr
England: 2017–18 FA WSL ends May 20
Faroe Islands: 2018 1. deild kvinnur started Mar 11
France: 2017–18 Division 1 Féminine ends May 27
Germany: 2017–18 Frauen-Bundesliga ends Jun 2
Iceland: 2018 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football) starts May 3
Ireland: 2018 Women's National League started Mar 11
Israel: 2017–18 Ligat Nashim ends Apr 28
Italy: 2017–18 Serie A ends May 12
Japan: 2018 Nadeshiko started Mar 21
Mexico: 2017–18 Liga MX Femenil season ends May 5
Moldova: 2017–18 Moldovan Women Top League started Apr 1
Netherlands: 2017–18 Eredivisie ends May 25
Scotland: 2018 Scottish Women's Premier League started Feb 11
South Korea: 2018 WK League starts Apr 23
Spain: 2017–18 Primera División ends May 13
Sweden: 2018 Damallsvenskan started Apr 14
United States: 2018 National Women's Soccer League season started Mar 24

Current season articles needing creation

Albania: 2017–18 Kampionati Femrave started in Oct
Algeria: 2017–18 Algerian Women's Championship started in Sept
Austria: 2017–18 ÖFB-Frauenliga started in Aug
Belgium: 2017–18 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal (nl) started in Sept
China: 2018 Chinese Women's Super League season started in Apr
Cyprus: 2017–18 Cypriot First Division started in Nov
Finland: 2018 Naisten Liiga started Mar 24
Northern Ireland: 2018 Women's Premiership starts Apr 18
Norway: 2018 Toppserien started Mar 24
Portugal: 2018 Campeonato Nacional de Futebol Feminino (pt) ends May 19
Romania: 2017–18 Romanian Superliga ends Jun 2
Switzerland: 2018 Nationalliga A ends May 26
Vietnam: 2018 Vietnam Women's Football Championship started Mar 10
Wales: 2017-18 Welsh Premier Women's Football League ends May 18

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Has an article you worked on been nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:IK Skovbakken logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:IK Skovbakken logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — trlkly 08:15, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Athletic Bilbao Femenino seasons, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ana González (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 26[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Atlético Madrid Femenino seasons, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Pernille Harder and Caroline Hansen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 2[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Adriana Martín (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Amstetten

Sonia Bermúdez (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Zamora

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Katrin Loo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Senec (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FCF Nord Allier Yzeure logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FCF Nord Allier Yzeure logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:10, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASD Mozzanica logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASD Mozzanica logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BM Remudas logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BM Remudas logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2018 All Japan High School Women's Soccer Tournament, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Miki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:List of invitational women's football tournaments[edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of invitational women's football tournaments".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 00:51, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2017–18 RCD Espanyol Femenino season[edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2017–18 RCD Espanyol Femenino season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (📧) 08:35, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019[edit]

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force News: July 2019

Opening ceremony of the 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup, Parc de Princes, Paris, June 7, 2019

Hello WOSO editors! What a 2019 FIFA Women's World Cup in France! There has been a lot of activity on tournament- and player-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of the tournament and its players. Let's keep the momentum going.

WOMEN IN SPORTS EDIT-A-THON FOR JULY + AUGUST!

WikiProject Women in Red is focusing on Women in Sports during their edit-a-thon for July & August 2019.

Get all the info here: Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red/Meetup/126

Sign up and help fill in the gaps within various articles related to women's football / soccer - whether they be players, teams, leagues, historical, administrators, referees, etc. Every little bit helps. Be sure to tag your article talk pages with {{WIR-126}}.

These edit-a-thons are a great way to work with others to help bridge the gender gaps on Wikipedia. Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

Australia: 2019–20 W-League
Belgium: 2018–19 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal
China PR: 2019 Chinese Women's Super League
Colombia: 2019 Colombian Women's Football League
Croatia: 2019–20 Croatian Women's First Football League
Czech Republic: 2019–20 Czech First Division (women)
England: 2019–20 FA WSL
Faroe Islands: 2019 1. deild kvinnur
France: 2019–20 Division 1 Féminine
Germany: 2019–20 Frauen-Bundesliga
Iceland: 2019 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football)
Republic of Ireland: 2019 Women's National League
Israel: 2019–20 Ligat Nashim
Italy: 2019–20 Serie A (women)
Korea Republic: 2019 WK League
Japan: 2019 Nadeshiko
Mexico: 2019-20 Liga MX Femenil
Moldova: 2019–20 Moldovan Women Top League
Netherlands: 2019–20 Eredivisie (women)
New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League
Nigeria: 2019 Nigeria Women Premier League
Scotland: 2019 Scottish Women's Premier League
Spain: 2019-20 First Division (women)
Sweden: 2019 Damallsvenskan
United States: 2019 National Women's Soccer League season

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. Sent by: Hmlarson (talk) 03:15, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 03:40, 17 July 2019 (UTC) on behalf of DannyS712 (talk)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:KIF Örebro DFF logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KIF Örebro DFF logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ryazan VDV logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ryazan VDV logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 2 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 8[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1996–97 FC Barcelona season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peseta (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 8 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2017–18 RCD Espanyol Femenino season[edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2017–18 RCD Espanyol Femenino season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 10:49, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Arianna Criscione[edit]

The article Arianna Criscione has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY and WP:NCOLLATH

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 10:45, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anja Hegenauer[edit]

The article Anja Hegenauer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 11:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irini Ioannidou[edit]

The article Irini Ioannidou has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 11:16, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Arianna Criscione for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arianna Criscione is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arianna Criscione until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mightytotems (talk) 20:52, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ASDCF Napoli logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ASDCF Napoli logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2018–19 Valencia CF Femenino season[edit]

Hello, Pakhtakorienne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2018–19 Valencia CF Femenino season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:34, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WHC Lada Togliatti logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WHC Lada Togliatti logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Women's Football / Soccer Update > October 2020[edit]

WP:WOSO News: October 2020

Chelsea striker Bethany England scoring the winning goal in the team's 2-1 win against Arsenal at the 2019–20 FA Women's League Cup, February 29, 2020.

Hello WOSO editors!

What a year to be alive. As usual (but perhaps even moreso since there have been unexpected quarantines), there has been a lot of activity on player, team, league and tournament-related Wikipedia articles with all of the worldwide coverage of women's football / soccer. Great work!

Fall Focus: FA WSL articles

You may have noticed lots of great things going on for the top English league this year: the FA WSL. More (international!) broadcasts, top international player signings, improved media coverage, and increased viewership. Let's keep the momentum brewing, shall we?

Here's a sampling of articles that could use creation, expansion or updating. What will you commit to working on?

Historical Topics

Managers

Teams

Brighton & Hove Albion W.F.C. roster update, add stadium, broadcasting sections
Everton F.C. (women) roster update, add broadcasting section, former manager articles

Players

Caroline Siems de (Aston Villa)
Ramona Petzelberger de (Aston Villa)
Asmita Ale (Aston Villa)
Ella Franklin-Fraiture (Aston Villa)
Elisha N'Dow (Aston Villa)
Jodie Hutton (Aston Villa)
Hannah Blundell (Chelsea) update
Danielle Turner (Everton captain) update
Nor Mustafa (West Ham)
Natasha Harding (Reading captain) update
Jane Ross (Manchester United) expand
Kirsty Hanson (Manchester United) expand
Chloe Peplow (Tottenham) expand
Hannah Godfrey (Tottenham) expand

Other

England women's national under-15 football team (see under-16 men's for inspiration)

See also Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Women's football task force/Initiatives/FA WSL to collaborate and organize with other editors.

Every little bit helps! Thanks for your contributions!

Did you know...

WP:GNG takes precedence over WP:NFOOTY (which only includes the players in two currently active women's leagues)? Often times there is enough media coverage that meets WP:GNG or other notability guidelines. For more information, see WP:WOSO#Notability and be sure to tag the new article talk page with: {{WP Women's sport|footy=yes}}

Current and upcoming seasons for top-division leagues

Australia: 2020–21 W-League
Belgium: 2019–20 Super League Vrouwenvoetbal
China PR: 2020 Chinese Women's Super League
Colombia: 2020 Colombian Women's Football League
Croatia: 2020–21 Croatian Women's First Football League
Czech Republic: 2020–21 Czech First Division (women)
England: 2020–21 FA WSL
Faroe Islands: 2020 1. deild kvinnur
France: 2020–21 Division 1 Féminine
Germany: 2020–21 Frauen-Bundesliga
Iceland: 2020 Úrvalsdeild kvenna (football)
Republic of Ireland: 2020 Women's National League
Israel: 2020–21 Ligat Nashim
Italy: 2020–21 Serie A (women)
Korea Republic: 2020 WK League
Japan: 2020 Nadeshiko League
Mexico: 2020–21 Liga MX Femenil
Moldova: 2020–21 Moldovan Women Top League
Netherlands: 2020–21 Eredivisie (women)
New Zealand: 2019 National Women's League
Nigeria: 2020 Nigeria Women Premier League
Scotland: 2020 Scottish Women's Premier League
Spain: 2020-21 First Division (women)
Sweden: 2020 Damallsvenskan
United States: 2020 National Women's Soccer League season

Have some new articles in mind or see some that need improvement? Add them to the Open Tasks.

Was an article you worked on nominated for deletion? See:

Want some tips, assistance, or resources from other WOSO editors?
Leave a message on the task force talk page.

Thank you for your continued contributions to articles related to women's football / soccer (WOSO)!

Women's Football / Soccer Task Force
#wikiwomeninred

Subscribe or Unsubscribe here. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sara Mérida for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Mérida is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Mérida until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Nikoleta Karakoleva[edit]

The article Nikoleta Karakoleva has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of being able to pass WP:GNG or any relevant SNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 20:02, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Karolína Nováková[edit]

The article Karolína Nováková has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a BLP with no assertion or evidence of meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 20:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vesna Mitrovič[edit]

The article Vesna Mitrovič has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

a BLP with no assertion or evidence of meeting WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 22:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karina Szymańska for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karina Szymańska is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karina Szymańska until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 22:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carmen Ferrer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carmen Ferrer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carmen Ferrer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 17:24, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nana Gelbakhiani for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nana Gelbakhiani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nana Gelbakhiani until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 18:44, 9 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katia Coppola[edit]

The article Katia Coppola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL as per Eurosport, Soccerway and because the only two sources providing coverage are this and this.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 13:33, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Naiara Ves[edit]

The article Naiara Ves has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL so does not meet any inclusion guideline. This is routine, this is a brief article in a local paper and this lacks depth.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 10:55, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Marta Luna[edit]

The article Marta Luna has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL and so does not meet any inclusion guideline.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 11:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katia Coppola for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katia Coppola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katia Coppola until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:11, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Honorine Corbel[edit]

The article Honorine Corbel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG. This and this, both from the same news source, are the only articles that provide her with more than a passing mention. She has spent a large portion of her career in the lower divisions of France and there is no assertion or evidence of notability here.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 19:49, 14 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marta Luna for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marta Luna is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Luna until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 18:40, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Naiara Ves for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Naiara Ves is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naiara Ves until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 18:47, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Svetlana Baikina for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Svetlana Baikina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Svetlana Baikina until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 19:05, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ksenia Veselukha for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ksenia Veselukha is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ksenia Veselukha until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 12:02, 2 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristina Chichkala for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristina Chichkala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristina Chichkala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 20:46, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elena Gorbacheva for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena Gorbacheva is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Gorbacheva until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone 22:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Constanza Cano for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Constanza Cano is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Constanza Cano until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:41, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marina Marimón for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marina Marimón is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marina Marimón until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:11, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Verónica Ávila[edit]

The article Verónica Ávila has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NFOOTY and possible WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 04:40, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Claudia Orsini[edit]

The article Claudia Orsini has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No detailed coverage found; fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 23:54, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Vera Homp[edit]

The article Vera Homp has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Definitely fails WP:NFOOTBALL and likely fails WP:GNG. Best sources were this piece in a regional newspaper and this transfer announcement. Coverage of regional amateur football in Germany is generally trivial.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:48, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Neus Motoso for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Neus Motoso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neus Motoso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anna Laue for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anna Laue is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Laue until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:09, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Alicia González for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alicia González is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia González until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:22, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claudia Barea for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudia Barea is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Barea until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Karen Moreira for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Karen Moreira is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karen Moreira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:01, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Villa de Los Realejos Tournament[edit]

The article Villa de Los Realejos Tournament has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Searches did not find enough significant coverage to show a passing of WP:GNG for this friendly competition.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:24, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lyn Meyer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lyn Meyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lyn Meyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:44, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of María José Rocafull for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article María José Rocafull is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María José Rocafull until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:47, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Concepción Ricarte for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concepción Ricarte is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concepción Ricarte until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nerea Gabirondo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nerea Gabirondo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nerea Gabirondo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marta Villagrasa for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marta Villagrasa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marta Villagrasa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:36, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sonia López Etxeberría for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sonia López Etxeberría is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonia López Etxeberría until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:52, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CB Conquero logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CB Conquero logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:34, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Paula Mateo for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paula Mateo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula Mateo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:28, 8 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Esther Hernández (footballer) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esther Hernández (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Hernández (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:52, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patricia Gudiel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patricia Gudiel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patricia Gudiel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:37, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of María José Casamayor for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article María José Casamayor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/María José Casamayor until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:45, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laura Jurado for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laura Jurado is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laura Jurado until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:06, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nuria Santiago for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nuria Santiago is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nuria Santiago until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:36, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Esther Romero for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Esther Romero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esther Romero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:16, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gaëlle Maugeais for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gaëlle Maugeais is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gaëlle Maugeais until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 17:46, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Véronique Pons for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Véronique Pons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Véronique Pons until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:29, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charlotte Poulain for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charlotte Poulain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Poulain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:30, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Aurélie Samptiaux for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aurélie Samptiaux is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurélie Samptiaux until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Makan Traoré for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Makan Traoré is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Makan Traoré until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:36, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Émilie Trimoreau for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Émilie Trimoreau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Émilie Trimoreau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 03:37, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Torino CF logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Torino CF logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:03, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ZPC Het Ravijn logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ZPC Het Ravijn logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:22, 29 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elena Cester for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elena Cester is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elena Cester until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:50, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Stefania Blancuzzi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stefania Blancuzzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefania Blancuzzi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:AS Orizzonte Catania logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:AS Orizzonte Catania logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:03, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Szentesi VK logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Szentesi VK logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Agnese Ricco for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agnese Ricco is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agnese Ricco until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 20:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CN Sabadell logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CN Sabadell logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:NC Vouliagmeni logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NC Vouliagmeni logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Olympic Nice logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Olympic Nice logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC Lehenda Chernihiv logo.gif[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC Lehenda Chernihiv logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:18, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katharina Griessemer for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katharina Griessemer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katharina Griessemer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:04, 23 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Susanne Kasperczyk for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susanne Kasperczyk is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susanne Kasperczyk until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:15, 9 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of child superheroes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of child superheroes, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of child superheroes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of animated feature films awards for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of animated feature films awards, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of animated feature films awards until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ladies First Cup[edit]

The article Ladies First Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NSPORT.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Let'srun (talk) 17:22, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ZNK Osijek logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ZNK Osijek logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]