User talk:Pankajsubedi2

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Pankajsubedi2, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:03, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2019[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pankaj. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jeppiz (talk) 12:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pankaj. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm not sure what you are trying to do, but the article at Pankaj is not about you. So please do not change it to add your own personal information there. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:02, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

If you have read and understood WP:NPERSON, you will understand that as a journalist you will will be considered suitably notable if you satisfy the specific criteria at WP:JOURNALIST - have you done anything that satisfies points 1, 2, 3 or 4?

Alternatively, can you provide evidence that you meet the general notability guideline at WP:GNG? Have you "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" (as it says there)?

You would need to provide multiple reliable sources (see WP:RS) which write about you in depth. Do you have those? Please just list the reasons you think you are notable here and list the URLs (website addresses) of the sources you think support your notability, and I will be happy to give you my opinion. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:30, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, WP:Your first article is a good guide to getting started with creating an article - it's well worth reading. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:33, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Create page[edit]

If any people search my name they only found my name on Facebook YouTube and Twitter more country people not know I am journalist of Nepal and my name was pankaj subedi only I have 4 points also. Pankajsubedi2 (talk) 13:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Search my name on social media try on facebook pankaj subedi my account have above 40 k followers also Pankajsubedi2 (talk) 13:49, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but that does not come close to addressing the notability requirements I outlined above. Just being a journalist, no matter how many Social Media followers you have, is not sufficient notability for an encyclopedia article. I have given you the actual notability requirements, and if you can not understand those or can not satisfy them, then I can not help you. (And, again, please do not create a new heading for every comment - it makes it confusing and hard to follow). Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:52, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pankajsubedi2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Pankajsubedi2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pankajsubedi2! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:03, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not social media

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Pankajsubedi2/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Pankajsubedi2/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 13:36, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (February 10)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:09, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pankajsubedi2[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Pankajsubedi2, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Agent00x (talk) 08:21, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Pankajsubedi2/sandbox[edit]

A tag has been placed on User:Pankajsubedi2/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Theroadislong (talk) 08:42, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Now please published.[edit]

I make its advertise. Pankajsubedi2 (talk) 08:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 11:58, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]