I deleted past random thought of mine,which was unfulfilled.Paperworkorange (talk) 03:18, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Memo[edit]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 01:08, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of the article "2019 in Japan" in English Wikipedia[edit]

Hello, Angelorphan. Happy New Year to you! 2019 is coming soon. Can you creat the article "2019 in Japan" in English Wikipedia? Thanks a lot!
123.150.182.177
14:47, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy new year for you too,Unfortunately I have really personal event on March which will take over my online life. I cannot keep up editing for a while.Angelorphan (talk) 19:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Me and VPN incident,Aug,2019[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Paperworkorange (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Mistakenly accessed to Wikipedia while using VPN.this IP seems to be blocked.For me,this is first time accessed using this VPN.

Decline reason:

No problem! Unfortunately, there's nothing we can do for you. The autoblock will clear automatically within 24 hours of you accessing the VPN or proxy, then you should be good to go! Yamla (talk) 20:00, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I understand,I've learned..I will be careful.Thank you!Paperworkorange (talk) 20:11, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But I am still confused what happened.I'm trying to understand "All VPN are bad".Is it ok?Paperworkorange (talk) 21:37, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

VPNs aren't bad. I mean, some of them are, but many are perfectly fine. It's just all of them are used to attack Wikipedia, so we have to block all of them. Nobody's claiming you personally are attacking Wikipedia, just that VPNs generally are widely used to attack Wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 11:54, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I see,I understand.I meant,"I should not access Wikipedia with VPN because I will be misunderstood automatically as someone attacking Wikipedia."I'm not taking it personally at all,I hope you understand.Thank you for explanation.I wanted to be sure not to make this mistake again.Thank You!--Paperworkorange (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like my block is over.

If someone like me happens to reading here,(unlikely though)don't click "Edit"while you are using VPN!. I have been browsing block log,realized just to block someone,including careless person like me is huge task. Thank you for Admins.I feel so embarrassed as this is 11 years old account.(but only 200 edit).--Paperworkorange (talk) 14:27, 10 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote[edit]

Dear Paperworkorange,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Thank you for invitation.I actually no knowledge for coding,so I hastily read what it is,then voted as "Wikipedian in general".Personally I think it's welcoming idea to omit war-relating word from General Project.Paperworkorange (talk) 11:49, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Announcing WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

Dear Wikipedians and contributors, the open source Wikipedia review tool, previously "WikiLoop Battlefield" has completed its name vote and is announcing its new name: WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Read the full story on the program page on Meta-wiki, learn about ways to support this tool, and find out what future developments are coming for this tool.

Thank you to everyone who took part in the vote!

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 18:23, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for let me know! I was trying to check ENwiki and JP wiki,found Vandalism (There are so many vandalism!)..but for now,Applecation is having error.As I was only one accessing at the time,I worry I might break it...Paperworkorange (talk) 19:50, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

Hi Paperworkorange,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

Random-Good night.Nov.5[edit]

Good night! I am so tired of yelling (Although they are written texts)person. -Paperworkorange (talk) 18:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

HI Paperworkorange,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review[edit]

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

random murmur[edit]

Geez that's why in Japan 布教　is sometimes translated to propaganda.Paperworkorange (talk) 14:42, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]