Jump to content

User talk:Papphase

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Papphase! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contribution. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! -- RP459 Talk/Contributions 16:37, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines
The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous





Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige --- Papphase your lies are laughable[edit]

You are spreading the same lies as this Bischof-Ralph or Ban Yoo user does. Are they your sockpuppets? Ofcourse is Seiwert Fleige a recognized catholic bishop. He did get consecrated in Palmarian Catholic Church. This is a catholic church. So who does not recognize this? Maybe members of other churches. But do you want to mark all anglican bishops as "unrecognized" because other churches dont recognize them? NPOV is needed in wikipedia ! And it is very obvious that the pope of the Roman Catholic Church recognized his consecration since he did celebrate mass with him. Or do you want to explain again that Seiwert Fleige tricked the whole world with his costume dressing ? This is realy laughable ! And the constant lie that his consecrator Archbishop Pierre_Martin_Ngô_Đình_Thục was not Roman Catholic is very easy proven wrong you only need to study the information in wikipedia. Why you use a shortmessage in shortnews to proofe that Napierski is a faker? This shows itself your lies and POV since the largest German Magazines Der SPIEGEL and Wirtschaftswoche explain that Napierski did find security problems in Ebay and offered to fix them but Ebay who wasnt able to fix them after some month didnt care. And the most reliable IT-Magazin in Germany IX - Magazin documented his scientific work in his area of braincomputing. Maybe you are not a liar but you just have a huge lack of informations then my latest version of the article can fill this lack: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alfred_Seiwert-Fleige&diff=345104517&oldid=345100878 But if you are serious about what you said then it should be easy for you to prove that these informations are wrong. And be aware that my article contains this warnings that you are talking about and I am not happy that they have been removed together with alot of other information.

--Templeknight (talk) 11:37, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh please, Napierski is well known for his strange antics, craving publicity. Currently is acting bishop, offering "real cross relics" for personal gain, posting souvenir documents as papal recognitions claiming to be "Professor" (which could actually give him some legal toruble in Germany, but no one takes him seriously enough, I guess). And, yes, that's faking. And if you are seriously suggesting that Napierski did in fact make grounds in braincomputing, you should have a look at his patents at DEPATISnet. Hell, this guy cant' even type and his "findings" are plain gibberish. Nothing of that ever worked. But i suspect you know all of that quite well, Ralph.

Besides, I don't care which fringe church Fleige is part of, that he's recognized by the Roman Catholic Church is an outright lie, disproved by various documents from German dioceses. --Papphase (talk)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Papphase&oldid=1063822491"