User talk:Parth.297

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Recent edit to Nirmal Baba[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nirmal Baba, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 22:14, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Indian Rebellion of 1857 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:08, 4 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Indian magicians[edit]

Information icon Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Indian magicians, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Prof. Mc (talk) 23:10, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Parth.297, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Parth.297, good luck, and have fun. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 13:01, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 09:53, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Al-Badr (Jammu and Kashmir) seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:22, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3 there are four links at the end of the sentence itself that states that it is a terrorist group. correct information triumphs your so called neutral point of view Parth.297 (talk) 10:01, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please check what WP:NPOV means, and also note WP:TERRORIST. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 21:35, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Discretonary sanctions reminder[edit]

Information icon You have recently made edits related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. This is a standard message to inform you that India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:08, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Kautilya3 so you mean that there are no issues with my edits but contentious fuckwittery is above truth? Parth.297 (talk) 10:32, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kautilya3 also the contentious topics that states value laden labels such as 'terrorist' can be used if there are reliable sources to describe the subject. there are multiple links in the article that describes al-badr as a terrorist organisation. Parth.297 (talk) 10:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest you use WP:HELPDESK if you are unable to understand policies expressed in plain English. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 11:48, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Kautilya3 that was a very personal low blow. I suggest you read the very same policies. The policy clearly states that if there are reliable references, such labels can be used. Parth.297 (talk) 12:02, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]