User talk:Pasadena, Texas

January 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Vitaium (talk) 07:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Please explain how I have disrupted Wikipedia. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Vitaium (talk) 07:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

The way I have edited Wikipedia is not disruptive as far as I know. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

See your contributions, you revert ClueBot NG and acting bad faith. Vitaium (talk) 07:32, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

I reverted his edit because I was in the process of making several edits at once. The removal of material was part of a series of edits I was making. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

New Section

User:Vitaium, I would like a candid conversation as to why you are specifically targeting me to block. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:34, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Because you've reach final warning and triggered edit filters Vitaium (talk) 07:41, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

That's not a very detailed explanation. Can you please look through all of my edits and explain to me how you have came to the conclusion that I am a vandal? Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:43, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

But please, explain your edits using edit summary so that people know what you're edit. Vitaium (talk) 07:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Ok, Ok. I can start doing that from now on. My mistake. I do tend to edit in a hurry so I apologize. But is there any other reason to accuse me of being a vandal? Any information I have removed that was important I have replaced using a different wording. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:47, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

 Done I've removed you from the vandal list Vitaium (talk) 07:50, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Thanks. Pasadena, Texas (talk) 07:51, 9 January 2022 (UTC)