User talk:Password123

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Carpet munchers. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. NawlinWiki 15:04, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to create inappropriate pages such as Carpet munchers, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 15:08, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. If you have questions, please contact me.

- Mr X 18:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC) - Mr X 18:59, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Did you miss the conspicuous edit notice at Steve Bannon? Right above the edit window, it states: You must not make more than one revert per 24 hours to this article, must not reinstate any challenged (via reversion) edits without obtaining consensus on the talk page of this article and are subject to discretionary sanctions while editing this page. You have already violated the 1RR restriction. Please proceed cautiously.- Mr X 19:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I actually haven't, but so be it. Password123 (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is the second time in the past week that you've broken 1RR on the article. Please self revert to this version.Volunteer Marek (talk) 01:45, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]