User talk:Paul Arthur Dooley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2022[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Arthur Dooley have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Arthur Dooley. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 02:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Arthur Dooley, you may be blocked from editing. Severestorm28 03:09, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:15, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok look I'm fed up this is over ..I'm getting in touch with wiki this is finished Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dooley[edit]

Hello. Please step adding original research. Even if you are his son, statements you add must be verifiable. Also, please don't talk in the article. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 03:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Paul Arthur Dooley. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. CodeTalker (talk) 03:22, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think me and me old man ignored each other ..conflict of interest ..I have all recordings on cd the workshop was not a tip as I tidied it regularly ..my dad taught me to weld use a angle grinder polish bronzes and chess ..there is no conflict as I have it all on cd ..STAND DOWN NOW Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 04:58, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The cd was made in London well it's a dvd whatever ..I have it I knew who made it with him on audio cassette and what's published on wiki is not the full story ..the cd .dvd is my intellectual property .as I inherited the Dooley estate ..EITHER TALK TO ME OR ILL EXCERCISE MY RIGHT AS THE DOOLEY ESTATE TO REMOVE ALL .. Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest ..MY FATHER ???please I'm a reasonable chap ..you are pushing it .....what conflict because I knew his best mate in prison in Libya .....Please I RUN THE ESTATE AND IM HIS SON ..you telling me not to publish on wiki ..?? Do you take a lot of acid Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:14, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok what was his pals name in Libya ..what Liverpool villain was looked after by him in Germany ..the nonce who tried it on with me and got knocked out ...you know NOTHING Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:35, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you stop insulting other editors and implying that you are going to take legal action, because those things usually only lead to one thing and that is a block from editing and at that point it will be very difficult to change the article for you. Other editors have already kindly tried to guide you but you've not been receptive to it at all, instead continuing with the behaviour that has already gone too far. For your own sake, stop. --TylerBurden (talk) 05:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I knew from a young age his guards pals .my grandfather me dads dad ..I know the page is me dads but he had family ....look I'm not happy at all I'm getting in touch with wiki ..I RUN THIS SHOW NOT YOU Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Trust me I have vivid account of everything on cd ..his pal in London did long interviews ..his pals son is a good friend of mine we have known each other since a awards ceremony at Wembley where my father isued bronze awards and bay city rollers fans almost trampled me .....I'm not saying his name but believe me lots of recordings Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:54, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Let's go.. I WILL SEND WIKI DEATH CERT AND FULL LEGAL PAPERS..IM DOOLEY.. PAUL ARTHUR .. Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 05:59, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Behaviour ..are we related ..I'm ARTHUR DOOLEYS SON PAUL ..WHO ARE YOU Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:01, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, being the subject's son most definitely gives you a conflict of interest according to Wikipedia's definition, as you would see if you would read the WP:COI article that you have been directed to several times already. It says Conflict of interest (COI) editing involves contributing to Wikipedia about yourself, family, friends, .... Private recordings and other personal information are of no use here unless they have been published in reliable sources, because no one except you has access to those sources, so no one can verify them. Again, if you would read the WP:V page you have been directed to, you will see what sources are acceptable here.
Your attitude and actions here, especially your legal threats, are going to quickly lead to you getting blocked from editing, at which point you will have absolutely no say in the contents of the article. Right now, you DO have a chance to influence the article contents, by finding reliable sources and posting them along with your suggested changes on the article talk page. It's up to you which path you wish to take, but I assure you that working in accordance with Wikipedia policies is the only way that you are going to get what you want. Please also note our policy on legal threats: WP:NLT. You had best immediately retract your legal threats above. CodeTalker (talk) 06:06, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please sit down and think we are not related you have never spoken or met MR DOOLEY YOU ARE NOT PART OF THE ESTATATE ..Where do u fit in please Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:11, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've made no legal threats apart from telling wiki IM THE DOOLEY ESTATE Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Read the numerous links you have been sent on this very page, you need to follow Wikipedia policy no matter who you are, in fact being related to the subject just gives you a conflict of interest. I'm really not sure what you think throwing temper tantrums on your talk page is going to accomplish, just read the policy and guidelines on how Wikipedia works. --TylerBurden (talk) 06:20, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Private recordings ..lol and also other knowledge ..the fact you can't even name my dad's pal in Libya ..it's not just recordings two people who lived and worked with my old man know the full story. ...but I've told them to say nothing Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:19, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One is a sucseful sculptor ..the other is me dads pals son ....the woman my dad met in a library is still alive my mother ..she has a few tales ..but not for YOU Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok fine I. RUN THE DOOLEY ESTATE ..AND I WORKED WITH ME DAD TILL THE LAST DAY Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:25, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We will see conflict as I'm not at all ll comfortable with it at its present state .... Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:28, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And the fact you can't name his pal in Libya who he hung about with in Liverpool after or the young lad who he looked after became a liverpool.gangster..you know nothing ..what do you know about us pouring bronze ..me me dad and uncle Jack ..nothing Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 06:34, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism[edit]

Why do you persistently add original research? That is not acceptable, read WP:NOORIGINALRESEARCH. It delibrately reads Articles must not contain original research and you broke it. Also, please stop your vandalism. This may lead you into WP:AIV, in which you are right now, and even worse, WP:ANI. So I suggest to stop now. Severestorm28 03:39, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir if you persist in using internet wiki etc to publish total untruths and hearsay regarding my father I will use the full force of THE DOOLEY ESTATE TO HAVE IT ALL REMOVED FROM WIKI ..WHERE ONLY THE BASICS WILL REMAIN ...I've just been reading the wiki page REGARDING MY FATHER and it's appalling as Its all hearsay and myths ..IM HIS SON ..AS OF TOMMOROW I WILL ASK WIKI TO REMOVE ALL ..as I RUN THE DOOLEY ESTATE NOT YOU Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 04:29, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to publish on wiki SPEAK TO ME FIRST ..PAUL ARTHUR DOOLEY Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 04:33, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not take me for some daft yob ..I have the people who knew my father well with me ..AND THE WORKSHOP BIT REMOVE NOW .. Paul Arthur Dooley (talk) 04:38, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what to say other than to reiterate what I said before. If you would like to edit the article, that's fine. You just have to make sure your claims can be supported by a reliable source and ensure that they're not original research. If reliable sources have supported a claim, it shouldn't be included in Wikipedia, even if it's true. Also, you don't own the article, even if you inherited his estate, and don't have a right to add or remove content at will. Nobody owns the article (individual contributors retain the copyright to their contributions and license them appropriately so that they can be reused), and editors have no obligation to seek your approval for changes to the article. Finally, because you have a conflict of interest, please read and ensure you follow our conflict of interest guideline. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 05:17, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clarification: I meant to say that "if reliable sources have not supported a claim, it shouldn't be included". Thanks to 73.127.147.187 for letting me know. Tol (talk | contribs) @ 20:40, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- TNT (talk • she/her) 07:27, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Paul_Arthur_Dooley&oldid=1065098972"