User talk:Paulkovach

Orphaned non-free image File:Pitt Swanson School of Engineering 2014 Wordmark.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pitt Swanson School of Engineering 2014 Wordmark.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:59, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017[edit]

Your addition to Swanson School of Engineering has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Paulkovach. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! CNMall41 (talk) 18:54, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Steven R. Little has been accepted[edit]

Steven R. Little, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chetsford (talk) 18:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pitt Swanson School of Engineering 2014 Wordmark.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pitt Swanson School of Engineering 2014 Wordmark.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:56, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Vorp has been accepted[edit]

David Vorp, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Mdriscoll03 (talk) 16:48, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021[edit]

Hi Paulkovach! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at David Vorp that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 17:02, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lance Davidson (January 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article does not prove his notability, see WP:NPROF. None of his awards are major enough, he needs a major awards from a large organization (not a grant).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lance Davidson and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Paulkovach! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Peyman Givi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page President George Bush. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing disclosure[edit]

Hello Paulkovach. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Paulkovach. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Paulkovach|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.

Scary language of the above template aside, I do not mean to say that your edits are badly intentioned; some of them seem to be improvements, and it looks like you're editing with some restraint. But you've disclosed that you work for U Pitt, and it appears likely that Wikipedia editing may broadly fall under your job. I think that past consensus at the conflict of interest noticeboard tends to suggest that disclosure is required. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 16:00, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Russ...thank you for your message. I am employed as Director of Communications for the University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering. However, I do not receive compensation for my edits; rather updating any content related to the School is part of my "other duties as required." I will gladly post the Paid template as you request. Paulkovach (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Paulkovach, thank you for adding the template! And, just to clarify, having it be a part of your job probably does fall under WP:PAID. (See "additional notes" there.) I know that there are a lot of rules here, but it's part of how Wikipedia manages to be a high quality resource. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:29, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! This is much appreciated. Have a great weekend! Paulkovach (talk) 17:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]