User talk:PcPrincipal
Welcome![edit]
  A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10... 100... 200
  Hello, PcPrincipal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Sam Sailor and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
If you need further help, you can: or even: Alternatively, place
Again, welcome, and happy editing!
This welcome message was sent by -- Sam Sailor Talk! 21:50, 23 September 2015 (UTC) |
Accessdate[edit]
There's no need to change the param to access-date. :) Welcome! -- Sam Sailor Talk! 21:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Blind Pilot because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 21:53, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kyrgyzstan, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Mongolian and Persian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 27 October 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 15[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sales development, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Salesforce. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Locked in the Poorhouse, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Comer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 2[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cascade County, Washington, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, PcPrincipal. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
June 2017[edit]
In a recent edit to the page John Tawell, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to India, use Indian English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. SpinningSpark 21:52, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, PcPrincipal. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
June 2018[edit]
Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Zombie, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:49, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
Courtesy notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have recently shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect: any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or any page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Ronz (talk) 02:25, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, PcPrincipal. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Removal[edit]
Inquiring about this edit. I added this box earlier this year and am unsure as to why this would necessitate removal due to it correlating with the Television series. Please advise, thanks. SunnyLetO (talk) 03:09, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Further - next edit removaled of sourced awards in place of controversies. Clear case WP:Undue weight. Something doesn't add up SunnyLetO (talk) 03:32, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- The infobox correlated to a separate subject (the Oz show). Seems unnecessary to have two infoboxes on the page. Better to just leave it at a mention of the show in the prose. Same with the Emmys I removed -- they were Emmys for the show, not specific awards granted to Oz. PcPrincipal (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- While I don't disagree that it may be unnecessary, and in some cases, cumbersome, to have two infoboxes on one topic, WP:Be bold and identify another place where it could be suitable instead removing non-controversial material when you don't like it. Same goes for the awards. SunnyLetO (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oz is a controversial figure so the content reflects that. Just the way it is. Also not sure what you mean by WP:BE BOLD in this context? The infobox doesn't belong on Oz's page and there's no show page, so I deleted it. Satisfied? PcPrincipal (talk) 22:30, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Also what other place is "suitable" exactly? See this discussion chain for why the content is on Oz's page. PcPrincipal (talk) 22:34, 21 December 2018 (UTC)
- Please refrain from putting words in my mouth. In no way am I saying that his manner and actions are not controversial. They are, and should be reflected while adhering to WP:BLP. It's highly problematic to remove neutral content about a show the subject is on when that's where it is discussed, and replace it with controversies. That's undue weight point blank. Be bold and create something if you don't see it. The link you sent has nothing to do with the infobox and I don't have time to look at it now. Thanks. SunnyLetO (talk) 22:27, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- While I don't disagree that it may be unnecessary, and in some cases, cumbersome, to have two infoboxes on one topic, WP:Be bold and identify another place where it could be suitable instead removing non-controversial material when you don't like it. Same goes for the awards. SunnyLetO (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2018 (UTC)
- The infobox correlated to a separate subject (the Oz show). Seems unnecessary to have two infoboxes on the page. Better to just leave it at a mention of the show in the prose. Same with the Emmys I removed -- they were Emmys for the show, not specific awards granted to Oz. PcPrincipal (talk) 10:40, 19 December 2018 (UTC)
- Interesting. You tagged it as having no lead even though you created it? Looks a lot like what I had put together so thanks for at least crediting me. What's your plan for the now-duplicated content though across all these pages? PcPrincipal (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hope you aren't discouraged forever.[edit]
I do understand your frustration with editing in Wikipedia. CollegeMeltdown (talk) 22:58, 27 December 2022 (UTC)