User talk:Pedroshin

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Someone must have been lazy, as you have not been welcomed yet. Thank you for your contributions. Since you have been here for a while, we can pretty much assume you are not a troll, vandal, or clueless newbie. I hope you continue to like the place and don't get all grumpy and leave over nothing. Here are a few good links for newcomers, even though you aren't one:

How to edit a page
Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Naming conventions
Manual of Style
Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.

I hope you still enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian, and won't get mad over something stupid and leave! By the way, please be sure to continue to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome, and sorry for your not being welcomed in the past! Alphax ^τεχ 09:48, 9 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Sony psp.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Sony psp.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Thorpe | talk 02:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Manuelalegre.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Manuelalegre.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. -- Carnildo 12:38, 1 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tomb Raider evolution picture[edit]

Nice job with Lara pic :) I love it. --sturm 21:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You[edit]

Thank you for the correction about my page. so, Japan and Portugal met in Age of Discovery. Portugal told Japan the gun and the cake of the West. The gun ended Sengoku Period. And, the cake of Portugal is liked now. (castella and konpeito)If we can exchange information each other, I am glad. :-) --HaradaSanosuke 21:14, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Cavacosilva.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Cavacosilva.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Oden 10:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links[edit]

Hello... you had a question about external links, specifically pertaining to the Heroes article. The Wikipedia guideline on external links outlines how unofficial sites, blogs, fan-based wikis and so on should be avoided. Part of the reason for this is to ensure that linked sites are reliable sources of information. In that respect, while "Heroeswiki" may be an interesting site, it is not necessarily a reliable one. The site encourages speculation about events in the series, which is completely opposite to what Wikipedia requires. Beyond that, however, the guideline exists to prevent Wikipedia becoming what is described as a "link farm". That is to say, if "Heroeswiki" gets a link, why shouldn't sites X, Y, or Z get one as well? (As an aside, the fact that there are articles with unofficial links doesn't mean that the Heroes page should have them as well - it only means that those other articles are not following the WP:EL guidelines. --Ckatz^chat _spy 17:18, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As for the "damage" note - apologies, but please understand that the more time one spends here, the more one encounters repeated changes made against guidelines, against consensus, and against extensive discussions as to how to proceed. After a while, it can become frustrating to have to fix the same issues over and over again. I certainly didn't intend to imply any malice on your part. Cheers. --Ckatz^chat _spy 17:22, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. Actually, the Wii article you mentioned does serve to demonstrate a different aspect of the guideline. Fan sites such as "Heroeswiki" - while interesting, and fun for discussing theories - aren't necessarily good sources of reliable information. That is to say, HW editors might have a great theory about the meaning of the fictional tattoo, but the outcome of that discussion can't be used as fact on Wikipedia. IGN, on the other hand, provides a discussion about actual hardware and software. Given its established history, that site might then be considered as a reliable source for reviews of the Wii platform. What is acceptable, and what is not - and what context to place it in - is a bit of a grey area, and can vary from article to article, site to site, topic to topic. --Ckatz^chat _spy 18:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Zelda:TP Gerudo theory[edit]

"You asked: "You mean the Gerudo Mesa where the portal to Midna's world is located? Think about that before you put that theory back on the page."

Yes I meant that, anything wrong with it? I didn't put it as a fact, but as a theory, just to spark some discussion between people. Since I didn't present it as a fact I have no idea why you decided to delete it... I'm not the first to speculate of such theory, as I researched on some forums beforehand. Explain why it can't be in the page. If things such as speculation aren't allowed in the articles (even though I've seen a lot of them around and not being removed) then forget what I wrote. Thanks. Pedrovsk 14:46, 1 March 2007 (UTC)"[reply]

Where did I wrote that? I know I did, but I'd like to read the entire discussion to give a better answer, and I'm not capable of finding it myself. I have no clue what the context was. Anyway, I understand I deleted something that was speculation. Wikipedia:No original research, this should explain part of why I deleted it. Wikipedia is and should be treated as an encyclopedia. Now, how often do you find mere speculation in a "physical encyclopedia"? that's why there's no place for it on Wikipedia either. Speculation, in my opinion, is okay if the suggested theory is significantly stronger than all other options. And that is by having a lot more and stronger arguments than the other options, not by having more supporters/believers than the other options. In the latter case, or if the other options are just as likely, no theories should be mentioned at all. As for speculation being everywhere, I know, and I'm not happy about it. However, I'm not going through all the work of figuring out what could stay and what can not. Only if I see a very obvious one, I'll remove it. There are a lot of TLOZ pages I'd love to give the GA improvement. However, because the franchise has so many fans and enemies, my work would most likely be undone or mutilated within an hour at the most. If you see speculation, feel free to remove it, because there's no place for it on Wikipedia.DreamingLady 08:16, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:LaraCroftTombRaiderEvo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LaraCroftTombRaiderEvo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Riana ^ऋ 12:23, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Forgottenhope.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Forgottenhope.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 01:09, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Hinoportugal.mid[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Hinoportugal.mid. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 17:04, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Hinoportugal.mid)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Hinoportugal.mid. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:42, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:APortuguesa.ogg[edit]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:APortuguesa.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Lokal _Profil 11:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:LaraCroftTombRaiderEvoWAnniv&newTRII.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:LaraCroftTombRaiderEvoWAnniv&newTRII.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:09, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use image problems[edit]

I notice you have uploaded the image Image:Cavacosilva.jpg with the {{current tag name}} fair use image tag. However, this tag seems unrelated to the content of the image, and as a result it may qualify for speedy deletion. Image:Cavacosilva.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why Image:Cavacosilva.jpg can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the {{current tag name}} tag that you have placed on it with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the {{non-free fair use in|article name that the image is used in}} tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it. However, you must not remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Dantadd 23:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Na verdade eu usei um template, nem sempre todo texto é adequado. Quanto à foto, a questão é simples: há uma foto disponível então não há fair use rationale mesmo que a imagem livre não seja uma maravilha. Em breve surgirá alguma melhor. O que me parece totalmente inadequado é usar non-free media simplesmente por caprichos estéticos. Dantadd 23:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tf2Demoman.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tf2Demoman.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tf2Engineer.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tf2Engineer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tf2Sniper.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tf2Sniper.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Tf2Soldier.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Tf2Soldier.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:13, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Dn966-1 200.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Dn966-1 200.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:22, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pp-laracroft-changes-1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pp-laracroft-changes-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:51, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pp-laracroft-changes-1.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pp-laracroft-changes-1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, an open access peer reviewed journal with no charges, invites you to participate[edit]

Hi

Did you know about Wikiversity Journal of Medicine? It is an open access, peer reviewed medical journal, with no publication charges. You can find more about it by reading the article on The Signpost featuring this journal.

We welcome you to have a look the journal. Like us on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Feel free to participate in the journal.

You can participate in any one or more of the following ways:

Publish an article to the journal. Even a medical student like you can make a submission.
Sign up as a peer reviewer of potential upcoming articles. If you do not have expertise in these subjects, you can help in finding peer reviewers for current submissions.
Sign up as an editor, and help out in open tasks.
Outreach to potential contributors, with can include (but is not limited to) scholars and health professionals. In any mention of Wikiversity Journal of Medicine, there may be a reference to this Contribute-page. Example presentation about the journal.
Add a post-publication review of an existing publication. If errors are found, there are guidelines for editing published works.
Join the editorial board.
Share your ideas of what the journal would be like in the future as separate Wikimedia project.
Donate to Wikimedia Foundation.
Translate journal pages into other languages. Wikiversity currently exists in the following other languages
- Ceština, Deutsch, Español, Français, Italiano, 한국어, Português, Slovenšcina, Suomi, Svenska, Ελληνικά, Русский, العربية, 日本語
Technical work like template designing for the journal.
Sign up to get emails related to the journal, which are sent to updateswijoumed.org. If you want to receive these emails too, state your interest at the talk page, or contact the Editor-in-chief at haggstrom.mikaelwikiversityjournal.org.
Spread the word to anyone who could be interested or could benefit from it.

The future of this journal as a separate Wikimedia project is under discussion and the name can be changed suitably. Currently a voting for the same is underway. Please cast your vote in the name you find most suitable. We would be glad to receive further suggestions from you. It is also acceptable to mention your votes in the wide-reachwikiversityjournal.org email list. Please note that the voting closes on 16th August, 2016, unless protracted by consensus, due to any reason.

Diptanshu^Talk 06:25, 12 August 2016 (UTC) -on behalf of the Editorial Board, Wikiversity Journal of Medicine.[reply]