User talk:Penny4URThoughts

Regardless of ones position on DADT, it is inappropriate for there to be a LGBT advertisement in the area of the page that is traditionally used for "an appropriate graphic". By its location, The LGBT ad biases the DADT article. The DADT needs to be volunatarily removed because it violates Wikipedia standards.

I cannot find any evidence of there being a registerd PAC called LGBT. Sterrettc (talk) 02:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Template:LGBT rights, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:31, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you disagree with the {{LGBT rights}} template being used in the Don't ask, don't tell article, blanking of the template is not the proper course of action as blanking the template removes it from all the articles that it is used in, not just Don't ask, don't tell. Instead, please discuss the issue on the article talk page as you have begun to do to reach a consensus on if the template is appropriate or not. As of now, the consensus appears to be that the template is appropriate. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: The consensus is that the template is appropriate for the article. You do not have consensus to remove the template. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please see the responses to the discussion you started at Talk:Don't ask, don't tell#Supporting Images. You do not have a consensus for the removal of the template. If you disagree with certain points in the response to your comment, then please continue to discuss the matter on the talk page. Your repeated removal of the content of the template is not the proper avenue for discussing the issue. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:57, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Template:LGBT rights. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Reach Out to the Truth 18:40, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.

The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:44, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show where there is consensus for removing it? I can't find it. Note that even if there is consensus, blanking the template is not the correct way to remove it from a single article. Reach Out to the Truth 18:55, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:08, 18 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Penny4URThoughts. You have new messages at Reach Out to the Truth's talk page.
Message added 19:12, 18 October 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]