User talk:Pepesia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Pepesia, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! GabeIglesia (talk) 15:20, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Broken references[edit]

The credit ratings you added to United States have missing references. Can you please get the intended refs too, please? EllenCT (talk) 17:54, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, these are all fixed now. EllenCT (talk) 19:25, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm Tempodivalse. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to List of hairstyles, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Tempodivalse [talk] 00:48, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in South Korea. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 09:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding what Tempodivalse stated above, I have reverted him. Flyer22 (talk) 15:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - you're right, it was a relevant addition! Pepesia (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. You're welcome. Flyer22 (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete citations[edit]

Hello, Pepesia. I made changes to your (and my) edits to the Lesbian article,[1][2][3] but I'm mostly here at your talk page to state that you added incomplete citations to the Lesbian article. See the Footnotes section of the article for what I mean. When moving references from one article to another, it's a matter of checking to see if the references you are moving are complete references and not just refnames. For what I mean about that, see Wikipedia:NAMEDREFS#Multiple references to the same footnote. Bringing over the refname in absence of the source in its entirety leaves the reference invalid. Flyer22 (talk) 15:15, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK Flyer, hang on I'll put those in. Pepesia (talk) 15:19, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you added in the full citations before I made this edit. Thanks. Flyer22 (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 17[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Austria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ottokar II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 01:55, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rohingya conflict in Western Burma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nurul Islam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]