User talk:PepperMTC

This user is a student editor in Washington_University_in_St._Louis/Gender_and_Politics_in_Global_Perspective_(Spring_2023) .

Welcome![edit]

Hello, PepperMTC, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Editing Wikipedia, a guide for student editors Choosing an article to edit Add images to articles Citing sources on Wikipedia
Additional Resources
You can find answers to many student questions in our FAQ.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 00:46, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have an overdue training assignment.[edit]

Please complete the assigned training modules. --Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:59, 15 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

The article is very good so far, but underdeveloped in some parts. The lead from the original article should be cut down and parts should be brought to the body, as it is overly detailed and includes information that is not in the rest of the article. The Criticism section should also be briefly summarized in the lead. Some subsections have not yet been written, but those that have are informative, relevant, and up-to-date information. The subsections can be strengthened with more information, including some taken from the lead, as it has additional information on Peru and Argentina. The Criticism section also needs to be finished with details on journalists’ criticisms. The information is almost all backed up by reliable citations. Many of them are news articles and could use additional peer-reviewed and scholarly articles. One of the strongest parts of the article is its tone and neutrality. It does not appear biased or argumentative and the Criticism section balances the perspectives. It is clear and easy to understand with only a few spelling errors. The article fills an equity gap, as the movement is very important, yet still did not have thorough coverage on Wikipedia. Sylvierichards (talk) 17:30, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review[edit]

The article is in good condition, however it still has to be developed. The lead seems to be missing and should help to outline and illustrate what the body talks about. The citations and sources appear to be reputable and current. There is additional information needed for Peru and Argentina. The article is very neutral and informative. It has very minimal spelling errors. This is a very important topic and helps to fill in missing information on Wikipedia The article is well-written and will be great when it's finished. Mckalet (talk) 19:19, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Ni una menos[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Ni una menos, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can (bot)&section=new report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]