User talk:Phd8511
Structure of the British Army[edit]
You might like this: Structure of the British Army#Army 2020. noclador (talk) 17:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)
- I didn't know that. The most interesting aspect I learned from doing the graphic is that the 7th and 51st Brigade are clearly intended to be deployable: the two artillery regiments (3 RHA, 4 RA), the two Close Support Engineer Regiments (21, 26) and all the units of 102 Logistic Brigade (minus the one paired with units in 101 Logistic) are meant to complete 7th and 51st brigade upon deployment. And one other thing: in my view 4th and 42nd Brigade should be merged to create one brigade of equal size to 7th and 51st. But however you look at it - this is the most complicated structured army I ever encountered. If doubt this will work... for deployments with enough time to organize the units it will work... but for short term emergencies... doubt it! noclador (talk) 12:03, 27 October 2013 (UTC)
- yep, the missing signal squadrons is another of these things I don't understand. British brigades now lack: signals, artillery, engineers, logistics... and will onyl get these when needed... the South African Army tried to do it like this too... and now goes back to the brigade structure. Also I suspect that most reserve units will be without equipment: i.e. the reserve artillery regiments will only train with the guns, but not have any... so they are purely filler for the active regiments... which leads me to think that most of the active units will be severely understrength. Also: the structure is full of waste; i.e. 6th REM&E supports 1st Armoured Infantry Brigade, but is under 101st Logistic Brigade, and is paired with an Army Reserve battalion under 102nd Logistic Brigade... or: artillery and engineer units are under 1st Artillery and 8th Engineer... but the REM&E units that will support them are under 101st and 102nd Logistic. Well, the British always have loved a confusing Army structure, noclador (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2013 (UTC)
April 2016[edit]
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Enough already. Drmies (talk) 18:35, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Drmies (talk) 02:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC) |
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]
Hello, Phd8511. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)