User talk:Phe-bot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

en:user talk:phe, fr:user talk:phe (main account, please use this account talk page), fr:user talk:badmood (fr: bot account)

interwiki bot

Bot flagged[edit]

This bot account has been flagged per [1] =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:18, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thx phe 20:22, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad edit[edit]

It added this [2] but it isn't the right link. SpencerT♦C 01:16, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

right, interwikis was wrong on fr: then propagated to en:, I removed both, Adam Miller (footballer) is yet another guy - phe 13:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Phe-bot has "corrected" the link to the Portuguese site to remove the double l from Castello. This is incorrect - the double l is there in the Portuguese. Bagunceiro (talk) 12:54, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, looking article history, actually the name is Castelo not Castello - phe 13:04, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It's wrong - check out the Portuguese wiki. Failing that would the Brazilian government's presidential gallery or the biography here persuade you? The error is understandable because the word for castle, "castelo", in Portuguese has a single l. But not in this name. Bagunceiro (talk) 09:56, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
did you follow the pt: link ? actually the name on pt is pt:Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, there is also a ref to explain why they use Castelo not Castello: À época de seu nascimento seu sobrenome era grafado Castello Branco, cuja grafia segundo o formulário ortográfico vigente é Castelo Branco. Pelas regras ortográficas vigentes, pessoas falecidas devem ter a grafia de seus nomes atualizada. Phe-bot (talk) 10:23, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I did, but it has changed since! I don't agree with it, but that's not a discussion for here, of course. Bagunceiro (talk) 10:48, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, applying new orthography for people name is debatable, but that's must be done on pt: Phe-bot (talk) 10:50, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

linked to deleted Jérôme Kerviel on de:[edit]

I reverted the Phe-bot's addition of a interlang link to de:Jérôme Kerviel - although the de: article may appear to exist, it has been deleted, protected to prevent editing, and the subject matter replaced with a wikinews article. This is complicated by some kind of strange experiment in progress over in de: -Wikianon (talk) 18:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strange experiment give strange result :) - phe 13:02, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patriarch Alexius II[edit]

I have made a suggestion at Patriarch Alexius II#Propose Protecting this Article that I think is workable. It changes the rules a little and should significantly reduce conflict. I would like to invite you to review the proposal and participate in the creation of a great article. It will stop edit warring by restricting work to the talk page in part because reverting another editors comments on the talk page is counter to WP:TALK. Jeepday (talk) 04:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well, the only edit I made was a minor interwiki fix. - phe 13:01, 2 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad interwiki on monoicous[edit]

This edit [3] added a link from a page about bryophyte biology to a page about flowers. The two articles are not about the same content, nor will they be. The English equivalent for Spanish monoica is monoecious not monoicous. --EncycloPetey (talk) 05:25, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, right, but bot will continue to add the wrong interwikis, de: has only one page for both notion and that page link to es: page. Monoecious is a redirect to Plant sexuality so es: article can't be linked here since es:Sexualidad vegetal exists. Perhaps you should add a {{nobots}} to monoicous but this template can't disable a specific bot operation like interwiki. Phe-bot (talk) 16:23, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect Interwiki[edit]

Your recent addition of fr:Coupe Telus - Offensif has been removed from Telus Cup article, and placed on Telus Cup - Offensive article where it belongs. Flibirigit (talk) 04:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, corrected it on fr: too, error came from an incorrect iw link on fr:wp: Phe-bot (talk) 08:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain me this quote[edit]

Hi, I am french, can you explain me this quote from "Lucy Brown" article please : "She also attended Oundle School which she eventually got expelled from for reinacting the orgasm scene from 'When Harry Met Sally' in the school library and Hills Road Sixth Form College and graduated from the Guildhall School of Music and Drama." Thanks you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.48.128.254 (talk) 08:52, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Elle a aussi fréquenté Oundle School, d'où elle a été expulsé pour avoir rejoué la scène d'orgasme de When Harry Met Sally dans la bibliothèque de cet établissement, ainsi que Hills Road Sixth Form College, elle est diplomé de la Guildhall School of Music and Drama. Phe-bot (talk) 09:21, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Patriation[edit]

Hi there - your bot made a correction to the page on Patriation linking it to the French page 'Night of the Long Knives.' I've flagged this up on the talk page, since as the Night of the Long Knives was only one part of the larger issue of patriation, it could be seen as nationalist bias. It could be that the link was added because it links backwards as well, but since I'm and English speaker I didn't want to go ahead and edit the French wiki - in addition, linking back to the larger subject in English doesn't quite pose the same problem as going the other way around. vckeating (talk) 00:15, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the interwiki from fr:Nuit des Longs Couteaux (Québec) to this article. Phe-bot (talk) 08:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad interwiki on Double Leaf Society[edit]

The Japanese wikipedia article ja:双葉会 is a later and different organization, not at all related to the organization described in the English language article Double Leaf Society. I have already reverted this once. Please delete from your bot list. --MChew (talk) 08:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I corrected interwikis in other lang too. In such case, please, correct all page else bot will continue to add the same iws over and over Phe-bot (talk) 09:15, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

this bot added interwiki pt:The Tea Party to en:The Tea Party. pt:The Tea Party is unrelated to en:The Tea Party --Anthony S (talk) 10:11, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed other wikis. Phe-bot (talk) 10:32, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]