User talk:Pheadirean

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Pheadirean! I am CharlieEchoTango and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. Thank you for your contributions. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions check out Wikipedia:Questions, or feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. Again, welcome!

«CharlieEchoTango» 09:06, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Pheadirean. You have new messages at WP:Help desk.
Message added 18:45, 6 December 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Message removed from article space[edit]

This is the content of the message you posted on a Wikipedia article main page. please repost on the appropriate message board. Thanks.--Kudpung (talk) 08:50, 7 December 2010 (UTC):[reply]

Note: If you have no idea what is "the appropriate message board", see my message below. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


  • Hello. Pheadirean. I see that you have tried discussing this on the article's talk page, which is the right thing to do, but you have not found the results satisfactory. WP:Dispute resolution has various suggestions about what to do in cases like this, and you may find some of them helpful. Among other things, the page includes a list of notice boards, of which perhaps Wikipedia:Content noticeboard might be the most appropriate one in this case. However, do look at the other suggestions on that page, and possibly before considering any of them there may be room for more discussion o the talk page. I don't have a magic answer to the problem, but I hope you will find something there that helps. Also, one of the things that most of us learn after a while is that on Wikipedia it is often necessary to compromise: even if you know you are right, settling for something that is not quite what you want, but better than what there was originally may be what you finish up with. Finally, if you spend much time on Wikipedia you will learn what belongs in different types of pages, and you comment did not belong in an article: such pages as talk pages and notice boards are the place for discussion, not articles. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page number of cited book?[edit]

Hi, thanks for adding the book reference to Daniel Mendoza, I fitted it into the {{Cite book}} template. But do you know the page number/s of the relevant information by any chance? And were any authors/compilers credited? Thanks. —Half Price 17:09, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Half Price

I will include a link to the synopsis of this book, it is only 40 pages long and goes by the name of the relavent person. Please see attached link to online Excerpt under Product Description.

http://www.betterworldbooks.com/british-people-of-portuguese-descent-id-1156804485.aspx

I hope this helps

Pheadirean

Ah OK, I had assumed you had the hard copy. Thanks. —Half Price 21:16, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Half Price

As a family historian I prefer genealogical references (eg. census records, birth deaths and marriage certificates, transcripts, parish or synagogue records, etc). With regard to book related resources I prefer history books to biographies, although I do own a copy of Daniel Mendoza’s autobiography ‘Memoirs of the Life of Daniel Mendoza’. When my genealogical references were rejected I searched earnestly for the next best thing, which I believe I found in this reference book (British People of Portuguese Descent) because it is similar to a genealogical resource due to its apparent dedication to getting the ancestry right. I hope you found it useful.

Kind regards

Pheadirean

Hi, Pheadirean. In the Peter Sellers page, you've referenced a Books LLC pamphlet: British People of Portuguese Descent. Books LLC. 24 May 2010. ISBN 1156804485. Do you know what kinds of books are produced by this publishing house? See: User:Fences and windows/Unreliable sources, Books LLC and Amazon.com controversies#Sale of Wikipedia's material as books.°°Playmobilonhishorse (talk) 02:49, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sellers[edit]

"The term ancestor is used to denote a direct descendant": not according to the OED, which lists several definitions, one of which is the legal sense you describe. - SchroCat (talk) 08:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]