User talk:Phil Bridger/October 2012 – December 2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Roberto de Ocampo

Thanks for the catch on my erroneous BLPPROD. I could have sworn I looked at history, but it's clearly there... My error entirely. Cheers! --Tgeairn (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Richard Fifer

aparently some people accessing google continue to recieve cached version which contains improperly sourced BLP claims about criminal activities. -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

it was briefly discussed Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_103#Content_from_deleted_versions_appearing_in_Google_search and I will see if i can find more about it if you wish (i think I found out about it on the BLP notice board.) -- The Red Pen of Doom 20:48, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
I very much doubt that renaming the article will make any difference. It seems to be something outside of our control that would need to be taken up with Google, but if you think there's a chance that a rename might help then I won't revert it again. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
I dont have any clue about the technicals, and did not move the article. it was moved by Maniako (talk · contribs) (who has an editing history that is strikingly similar to Bluepenoffun (talk · contribs)). -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:23, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
well, on second thought, my google preview section now lists under his name (as categories?) "convicted drug dealer" - as far as I can make out from the spanish language sources he has not been convicted, merely charged, and then accused of bribing officials to make the charges go away. -- The Red Pen of Doom 21:31, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

VIAF reverts

I would have liked to be able to leave an edit summary, but unfortunately doing it via rollback doesn't seem to allow one! However, given the complaints about formatting, I decided it was best to mass-rollback and then overwrite with the "correct" edits as soon as possible, which will hopefully minimise the impact on watchlists.

Apologies for the inconvenience! Not the best solution however I did it, I guess. Andrew Gray (talk) 21:10, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Phil Bridger. You have new messages at Andrew Gray's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SPI

Hi mate,

Thought you should be aware of the following - Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Brainbug666.

Cheers, Stalwart111 (talk) 23:46, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Buildings

My rational for nominating under A7 is that buildings are generally also companies, and thus qualify under the organization category. But I can prod them all instead if you think that's safer...maybe I'm stretching on A7. Qwyrxian (talk) 10:44, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Buildings are generally also companies? No, they are quite obviously never companies. Buildings are inanimate physical objects whereas companies are legal entities made up of people. Phil Bridger (talk) 10:49, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aag Ka Darya, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily Times (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:15, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HD Draw

Hey,

I get the feeling that this article can be kept; I'm wondering where a bulk of the information is coming from, which may be the Trains magazine. Do you have this publication? Without it, it might be tough to keep. - Theornamentalist (talk) 21:19, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Tom Sjogren

Thanks for finding originals of those news articles! The person who filed the AfD said there appeared to be few sources, and I have found more and more newspaper archives are either paywalled or refuse to allow Google indexing, so I'm assuming you took the time to specifically search for each one, but maybe I just didn't beat the bushes enough on Google News first. Either way, I'm hoping the article can be kept with those sources added. Yngvadottir (talk) 04:31, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Drace-Francis

As usual, thanks for letting me know.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:00, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Civil

See WP:CIVIL. Stop the personal attacks against me. It is a weak tactic to try and attack someone in a debate with ad hominem comments. I've had minimal interaction with you, so knock it off with the characterisations of why I do things. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:55, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Don't be ridiculous. I'm perfectly entitled to point out flaws and inconstistencies in your comments. Phil Bridger (talk) 23:03, 14 October 2012 (UTC)
Absolutely. Without looking to see where this came from, though, I can recommend addressing the issue rather than the issuee. For example A says, "the sky is blue", instead of B saying "A, you are wrong", or "you are wrong", it is better to address the issue - "not in my experience", "except when it is overcast", or even, "on Earth maybe", but in all cases focusing on the issue and not on the individual making the remark. All of us are a diverse group of individuals who can all contribute something to improving WP. So please do point out flaws and inconsistencies, but address them generically and not at the individual who made them. And please do keep it civil. Apteva (talk) 18:12, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Quite. I did address the issue rather than the issuee. If you had looked at where this came from then you would have seen that. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:29, 18 October 2012 (UTC)
Excellent. Apteva (talk) 18:34, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salty Fingers (plant)

Even if you discount the potential socks, I don't think it changes the outcome - marginal sources, marginal headcount (although I guess if the headcount went to four to four, the closing phrase would need to be slightly different). WilyD 08:36, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anatoly_Wasserman

Since this AfD is closed, I choose to respond here to you. If a trusted editor could translate the text, perhaps as a quote inside a citation, I would be happy with that. The real problem is that Russian uses an alphabet that Google often mis-spells or mis-translates, thus I can't verify that any of it is true. A book source is fine with me, because I have access to subscriptions that I can use to verify an English, Spanish, or French text source. Since I found at least one English online source, I invoked WP:BARE. Bearian (talk) 14:44, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Removing PROD BLP

In this edit you removed the BLP PROD from Aram Van Ballaert, with the edit summary: remove WP:BLPPROD tag - now has a reference. The requirement is not just a reference, but a reference to a reliable source. Do you consider a flyer published by Van Ballaert's managing agency to be a reliable source? WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:03, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

The source is published by the Belgian embassy in Ukraine. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Not exactly. The source was published on the website of the Belgian Embassy in Ukraine. Van Ballaert appeared in a concert there, and the embassy published the managing agency's flier as part of that performance. No Circus is the managing company: you can see the link to their website at the bottom of the first page of the cited reference. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
So we have a source that the Belgian embassy chose to republish saying that van Ballaert played in a concert in Kiev. Are you saying that we can't rely on that to be true? Of course we can. He may or may not be notable (I haven't checked) but the article gets past the requirements of WP:BLPPROD. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:15, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
I suspect we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:18, 24 October 2012 (UTC)

Merging Porul ilakkanam to Tamil grammar

I have proposed that Porul ilakkanam be merged to Tamil grammar. Since you recently discussed the articles at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Porul ilakkanam, I would welcome any comments you may have on the proposed merge. The discussion is at Talk:Tamil grammar#Merge discussion. Thanks, and happy editing. Cnilep (talk) 04:16, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

Mattheus Marinus Schepman

For someone who has been here as long as you have, your edit summary is disappointing. As I would have thought you would know, a CSD deletion decision is based on the text of the article, not on what one can find elsewhere written about the subject. I have, as it happens, restored this article, which I did before your comment and hence not because of it. The article, as posted, contains absolutely no assertion of notability, unless you wish to stipulate that being an expert on molluscs is an automatic and intrinsic assertion de facto. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 21:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

The article had a reference and a "further reading" section listing a book and an academic paper when it was restored, so they must have been there when you deleted it. These are clear indications of importance/significance, as required to get past WP:CSD#A7. It is your action in deleting this, rather than my completely accurate edit summary, that is disappointing. You have demonstrated what I have long thought, that Wikipedia's greatest problem is the Dunning–Kruger effect. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:51, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Your De-PROD of the page for Dr. Philip Oxhorn

Hi Phil Bridger. I wanted to commend you on your common-sense De-PROD of this article. The subject clearly and unambiguously meets notability guidelines.

I was hesitant to De-PROD it myself, as the Nom is an activist pursuing a beef against the article creator (me). S/he gutted the article of references a few days ago then PRODded it for lack of RS and proof of notability. When I looked at this editor's edit history, it looks like s/he does this kind of thing regularly: de-references articles then nominates them for deletion due to lack of references.

Any chance you'd want to have a look at the page's edit history and think about re-inserting some of the content that was in the article before it was maimed a few days ago... or maybe just as it stood [here]? Regards Celtechm (talk) 18:45, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

I contested deletion because the rationale given was obviously incorrect. That doesn't mean that I'll help you in your efforts to earn money by editing Wikipedia. I'm a volunteer here, and make my own choices about what articles to improve. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:21, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Two things...
1. The DePROD was the correct thing to do, so I meant to support your sensible edit. Also, I intended to shed light on a clear case of disruptive editing by an editor who does this habitually and, we must assume, thinks this is also correct. I still hope that someone else will see the impropriety of this and take him to task for it, but you may not be the guy.
2. I have no financial interest in this activity, nor in the page in question. Rather, I am concerned that the efforts of editors who act as activists place a chilling effect on rational debate and impede group decision making while seeking consensus within the community. I am volunteering my time in pursuit of improving Wikipeda, as are you. Celtechm (talk) 19:51, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Mattheus Marinus Schepman

The DYK nomination included you. You helped get the delete undone. This was worthwhile, and makes you part of the team. I think you deserve recognition. Indeed, if it had not been undone, the rest of this would have been a 'nonstarter.' Moreover, this is not a zero sum game. Template:Did you know nominations/Mattheus Marinus Schepman‎ would be the link. But it's your decision. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 22:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

PRSA

Hi Phil. After having recently expanded the PRSA article, I went back and did a substantial trim based on the GA reviewer's feedback. I was wondering if you felt the undue issue was addressed and if you had any other feedback on getting it up to GA. Corporate 05:23, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

My apologies good-sir for my repeated errors. Corporate 15:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Reynolds (agriculturist) (and others)

Hi! Thanks for adding the sources to this article. I usually do a quick search to see if I can find something useful, but to be honest quite a number of the articles tagged as having notability issues almost five years ago isn't on notable subjects. All this time with no improvement despite the tag means it's time to evaluate it. If someone can come up with refs during an AFD or a {{tl:PROD}} period I'm all for keeping it, but if not it needs to go. Bjelleklang - talk 16:09, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Again you are using this word "someone". Don't you realise that you are someone? Yes, it's time to evaluate it, not to nominate it for deletion without any basic evaluation. It's pretty obvious that an 18th century agriculturalist will be more likely to have attracted coverage in books than on the Internet, so searches such as this and this are the bare minimum that anyone, let alone a trusted administrator, should check before deletion nomination. If you think that we should automatically nominate for deletion any article that has had a notability tag on it for five years, whether the tag is accurate or not, then I suggest that you propose a bot to perform the nominations and see what response you get. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:19, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Yes, someone. As you just showed I don't catch everything, and I have no problem admitting that. I could have done a better job on finding sources on this, which is why an AfD is a good thing because other people help check the article. But being an encyclopedia, references should be (and is as far as I know) a minimum requirement. I guess we agree on this, but have a different threshold for when to keep and when to delete. :) Bjelleklang - talk 21:34, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

Porcelain (band)

It appears that the page creator (who also appears to be a member of the band) has re-inserted my speedy deletion notice. I'm not really sure what to make of this. — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 19:05, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

It was probably an edit conflict. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:08, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

John Lofting

Sorry about that. Was NPP'ing while very tired - inadvisable. Feel like an idiot. — Francophonie&Androphilie (Je vous invite à me parler) 22:24, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

The only real idiot is someone who never feels like an idiot. Phil Bridger (talk) 22:47, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Half Barnstar
actually, I saw some informations on other websites that the test track of the UP Monorail is 465 meters not 56, the line is really 7 kilometers, it's impossible that the line could only be 500 meters with many stations, how the train can run 50 kph? Dirk Paul Kulits (talk) 08:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
Please provide a reference for this. It's not good enough to say "I saw some informations on other websites" without giving precise details of where you saw the information. None of the sources in the article, or that I can find anywhere reliable, say that this line extends, or will extend, to more than 500 metres, which would make the unsourced claim of having 13 stations incredible. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:30, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Contested PROD for Village Development Committes in Nizamabad Andhra Pradesh

My wording did not mean "these types of organizations" but rather the organizations (plural) that the article is referring to. This article was created by a person with a long list of low-quality contributions and complete refusal to interact with other editors or respond to requests or warnings in his talk page. While not grounds for deletion in itself, I went to WP:AN to inquire about dealing with this problem and it was suggested that they be PRODed (on a case by case basis obviously). Some have borderline value, others - like this one - do not. I see you moved the article to something more generic, so hopefully you will expand and source it. My basis for the PROD of the original version stands, however, as being at best narrow in cultural and geographical scope. §FreeRangeFrog 00:17, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

How is anyone reviewing your deletion proposals supposed to know that there's such a back story if you don't refer to it in the deletion rationale? The rationale that you gave is obviously inapplicable for the reason that I gave when I contested deletion. It's the article, not your rationale, that says that this is about a type of organisation rather than an individual organisation, making WP:ORG inapplicable. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:25, 22 November 2012 (UTC)
I guess I'm not being clear here. Tickle Parlors in Allegany County, Maryland is not notable; Tickle Parlors in the United States is. Your move to a title of broader scope makes sense, the topic is no longer narrow in geographical scope. It wasn't before. Quite frankly it didn't occur to me to move it to something that would be India-specific. And I wasn't contesting your removal of the PROD, just clarifying why I PRODed it to begin with. Anyway, sorry for the disruption. §FreeRangeFrog 00:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Santosh Oraon confusion.

Hello. Just want to clear up what I meant on the PROD. I did not mean no sources at all, I meant that there was no sources that indicate that he has played in the I-League which is the professional league you need to play in (based on WP:FPL) and also the source in the article is for a friendly match between Bagan and some sort of all-star team. I already tried looking for a source that says that he had played in the I-League and all I get is sources for another player from Prayag United. I will bring the article to AfD and you are welcomed to contribute. Cheers and I hope I cleared this up. --Arsenalkid700 (talk) 02:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Robotic admin

I saw you comment at AfD. I think that happens because it seems that the ideal candidate at AfD the last few years is somewhat robotic, with a year or two of mostly uncontroversial vandalism or cleanup work, a couple bits of audited content (usually solo work), and avoidance of any real controversy (and usually no particularly strong opinions or insight on policy matters). Gigs (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2012 (UTC)

hi can you not review my article List of countries by Titanium production??

Its flagged once again, also i have question can i remove the tag by my own as i dont see how i can imporve the article more--Venajaguardian (talk) 06:30, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

With regards to Ilepcimide

Am I right actually thinking that it is CSD worthy? I'm something of a beginner with the Criteria For Speedy Deletion and this is the second kickdown i've had with it. As for A1 I believe I mistook 'context', would you say that article falls under G2, A3 or A7? MIVP - Allow us to be of assistance to you. (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 14:10, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Certainly not. Whatever makes you think that this should be speedy deleted? Phil Bridger (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
The fact that it had only one line of text explaining it. Like I said I am not very experienced with the CSD. I am working to improve my understanding but as of now I am in the stages of 'working it out'. MIVP - Allow us to be of assistance to you. (Maybe a bit of tea for thought?) 21:03, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
That means that it needs expansion, not deletion. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:42, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Abdul Ghaffar Naqshbandi - Speedy Deletion

Regarding the speedy deletion that you contested, I would like to point out that the AfD that was started was closed as no-consensus under the lack of quorum subsection [as there were no other votes on that AfD]. And secondly, I put this article up for deletion only because it does not appear to be an article of a "prominent" scholar. The only vestige of prominence appears to be in noting the names of his predecessors and successors, and that claiming that he had many followers without any source. TheOriginalSoni (talk) 15:34, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

GROMOS

Hi Phil Bridger. You might want to look at the recent edits by Stuartyeates (Special:Contributions/Stuartyeates) in an attempt to understand his behavior regarding GROMOS. He's a deletionist, for better or worse. See MADNESS for another example. Jeff.science (talk) 08:54, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Can you review my page A Bittersweet Nostalgia

My page has been marked for deletion though I have provided numerous links at the bottom of the articles page directing to external websites and press releases in the USA.

The article/page is about a published novel by Strategic Book Publishing & Rights Agency. The ISBN code is 978-1-61897-925-4

Below are reliable sources for websites on the published article.

Amazon - direct link to the book.

Barnes & Noble - direct link to the book.

Link to publisher's website

Press Release

Thank you.

I am just a page lurker, but I have a couple of suggestions. It would help if you put in some in line references, and particularly references to third part WP:RS such as reviews, interviews, and commentary. This would go a long way toward establishing WP:Notability, which seems to be part of the hang up. Hope that helps. In the fuure, please sign your posts using four tildes ("~") 7&6=thirteen (☎) 19:35, 5 December 2012 (UTC)


Maya Jobarteh page request for deletion

Im writing to find out if you may be able to help/point me in the right direction regarding being able to get the page "Maya Jobarteh" deleted. Im following up your objection to my request for this page to be deleted. The artist's real and correct name is Sona Jobarteh, however there was an educational website (soundjunction) that used the wrong name by mistake about 10 years ago. Someone then created the page "Maya Jobarteh" in Wikipedia as a result of this blunder. A few other sources picked up on this error and used the wrong name, but there hasnt been a problem with this mistake on websites for many years. However the problem is now resurfacing because for some reason google is picking up and displaying Wikipedia's old page "Maya Jobarteh" instead of the correct one "Sona Jobarteh". When you type "Sona Jobarteh" into google it sources and displays in big letters "Maya Jobarteh" from Wikipedia. The artist has contacted me about it to try to get this fixed as it has recently been causing confusion and queries by her followers, but is more importantly offending the artist as her name cannot be sourced correctly by google due to Wikipedia's incorrect information. Im unfortunately not a Wikipedia wizard, but have been her manager for the past six years, and understandably she is very aggravated that this problem is arising all over again after so many years. Wikipedia as i understood should be an accurate source of information, and any errors should be corrected as soon as they come to light. This is a total error and needs to somehow be addressed. Is there somewhere you can point me in getting this sorted? Now that my deletion request has been contested Im not sure what we do next about this frustrating problem. Many thanks, Sam

Grigol University

And it also has a lot of spam... Since it's obviously notable, and since you are not the creator, I've restored and spent the last 15 minutes or so cleaning it up. I've added it to my watchlist now too. Cheers Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:21, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

ABNXcess

Sorry if I made a mistake on that. I had seen similar cable lineup articles deleted a couple of weeks ago and thought it qualified. --MJH (talk) 15:30, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Choralerna, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rodopi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

Amir-Abbas Fakhravar

Please note that all attempts to create a neutral POV for http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amir-Abbas_Fakhravar are being constantly reverted by two individuals: Siavash777 and Sorenaaryamanesh — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabirat (talk • contribs)

Yes, I have noticed that, but please don't try to combat that by continually reverting, as that might end in your being blocked for edit warring. You have done the right thing by posting on the article talk page, which the other editors have not, so if they revert again I'll alert an administrator to block them from editing, so please don't get yourself blocked by also continuing to revert. Phil Bridger (talk) 21:13, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
The user Siavash777 continues to revert all changes without engaging in a discussion about them despite my best efforts. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kabirat (talk • contribs) 05:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Hand-coding

Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at okeyes@wikimedia.org and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in #wikimedia-office connect. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:28, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!!

For all you do!! Have a wonderful HOLIDAY!!


Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RFC/U for Apteva: move to close

I am notifying all participants in Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Apteva that Dicklyon has moved to close the RFC/U, with a summary on the talkpage. Editors may now support or oppose the motion, or add comments:

Please consider adding your signature, so that the matter can be resolved.

Best wishes,

NoeticaTea? 04:19, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Tourism in Oman G12 decline

I'm not the G12 tagger (I'm the advert tagger, who should have taken that as a clue to check for copyvio but overlooked it.) but saw your edit summary and tried to look for the last clean version. Unfortunately a version as early as Oct 12, 2007 contains whole paragraphs from the tagged site. The previous version is largely copied internally from Geography of Oman (and doesn't say much about tourism anyway), and before that it consisted entirely of inappropriate external links so I can't see how to satisfy your request to revert to a usable version. Kilopi (talk) 22:10, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Magdalenengarten

Thank you for contesting the speedy deletion of the article. It refers to a baroque park which is an important sight of my home town. I am the author of the original German article and I did not write a literal or complete translation. Should I write the article again using an English name of the park? If so I would have to invent one as in all the English brochures and books they only use the German name. Merry Xmas,--Torbenbrinker (talk) 16:41, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Phil Bridger. You have new messages at Talk:Kartepe.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mohd. Masood Ahmed

There are no claims in the Mohd. Masood Ahmed sourced to any reliable sources. The so called Refrerences are really External links. 216.93.234.239 (talk) 00:09, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

The same thing with Ali Mandalawi. There are no sources to provide proof for any contentions made in the article. 216.93.234.239 (talk) 00:12, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Please read the WP:BLPPROD policy before placing any more such tags. Both articles have links to sources that confirm some basic facts about these people. The fact that they are in a section labelled "external links" is irrelevant to whether they qualify for deletion by this method. Phil Bridger (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

I have started a discussion at Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons/Noticeboard#BLPs_with_no_linked_sources. 216.93.234.239 (talk) 02:53, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Phil_Bridger/October_2012_–_December_2012&oldid=1079202344"