User talk:Philosopher/Archive 26
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 20 | ← | Archive 24 | Archive 25 | Archive 26 | Archive 27 | Archive 28 | → | Archive 30 |
Marv Diemer
Hi-Marv Diemer died recently. He served in the Iowa House of Representatives. I wanted to ping you on this. Thanks-RFD (talk) 10:23, 25 April 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you again for keeping an eye on these things! I'm not currently editing much due to RL issues, but hope to be back at it soon. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 06:53, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Charlize Theron
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Charlize Theron. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 19:16, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Help test new SuggestBot design
We have developed an exciting new version of SuggestBot’s interface with some cool features! Volunteer to be one of the first users to try it and help us make it better by answering a short survey! If you’re interested in participating, leave us a message on SuggestBot’s user talk page. Regards from Nettrom, SuggestBot’s caretaker. 18:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot’s recommendations. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.
We have added information about the readership and quality of the suggested articles using a Low/Medium/High scale. For readership the scale goes from Low 
to High 
, while for quality the scale goes from Low 
to High 
.
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:53, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
Sorry for the intrusion, but...
Hey, Philosopher, I noticed that you were having some trouble with the CSS. I believe the problem is that you can't use the double-slash method of commenting in CSS; I think it only accepts the slash-start (/* comment */) method. I took the liberty of removing it from your CSS page; let me know if it starts working. Thanks! Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 20:20, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks a ton! It's working beautifully now. --– Philosopher Let us reason together. 20:22, 3 May 2013 (UTC)
Notifications box replacement prototypes released
Hey Philosopher; Kaldari has finished scripting a set of potential replacements available to test and give feedback on. Please go to this thread for more detail on how to enable them. Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 15:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
- Cool! Thanks for letting me know - I probably won't be able to try them out in them out in the next couple of days, unfortunately, but will take a look at that page when I can. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
- Oh, that's what it's about! Right, posting there very soon. Thanks for sharing! – Philosopher Let us reason together. 05:07, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
It's always nice to get unexpected help...
...I gave my appreciation at my talkpage.TMCk (talk) 22:22, 12 May 2013 (UTC)
Lawrence Pope
Hi-I want to ping you about Lawrence Pope who died recently. He taught at Drake University and served in the Iowa House of Representatives. Thanks-RFD (talk) 10:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you! – Philosopher Let us reason together. 18:53, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Re: Proofreading please (from the spanish Wikipedia)
Hi Philosopher. Thank you for writing on Spanish's Wikipedia. I saw your page, and an article like this, maybe can be deleted, because a lack of references. I will take your external links section and use it for references. But, if you have other references, please show it. Good luck. Jmvkrecords ⚜ Intra Talk 08:01, 26 May 2013 (UTC).
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Sockpuppet (Internet)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Sockpuppet (Internet). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
es:wiki
Hello. Created your es:User:Philosopher/common.js. Regards, Mercedes Gusgus talk 20:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gusgus (talk • contribs)
- Thanks! – Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Philosopher, we moved your Teahouse host profile
Hello Philosopher! Thank you for being a host at the Teahouse. However, we haven't heard from you lately, so our bot has moved your Host profile from the host landing page to the host breakroom. No worries; you can always just and our bot will move your profile back. Editing any Teahouse-related page will do the same thing for you. If you would prefer not to receive reminders like this, you can unsubscribe here. Thanks for your help at the Teahouse! HostBot (talk) 03:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:00, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Margaret Mutu
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Margaret Mutu. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Automatically assessed
Hallo, just saw your comment here, and as the deletion is closed I can't comment, so I do it here ;-). Nobody knows when someone starts to automatically assess talk pages. It happened for the WP Chemistry project in March (one example here: Talk:W49), but "luckily" the project had a Category:Automatically assessed Chemistry articles :-) (Most of the articles in that category, if not all, is from March). My two cents :-) Christian75 (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)
- Since the CfD was about keeping empty categories around, I'd assume that you're free to re-create the categories if they are ever populated. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 02:47, 21 July 2013 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.
IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.
Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:
- Views/Day
- Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
- Quality
- Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.
The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:
- Content
- Is more content needed?
- Headings
- Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
- Images
- Is the number of illustrative images about right?
- Links
- Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
- Sources
- For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Robert D. Fulton may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- to serve as Governor of Iowa until the 1999 inauguration of [[Tom Vilsack]].<ref name=biography>{{cite web|url=http://www.nga.org/cms/home/governors/past-governors-bios/page_iowa/col2-content/main-
- Governor Robert David Fulton|accessdate=July 25, 2013|publisher=National Governor's Association]</ref>
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks,
fixed. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 04:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Steven Crowder
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Steven Crowder. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 20:15, 27 July 2013 (UTC)
want to recreate category Sandboxes
Years ago, Category:Sandboxes was deleted. I would like to recreate it and make it a redirect to Category:Xn, because it would be easier to remember than the latter. (Category:Xn is new but replaced a prior parent category.) If Category:Sandboxes may confuse readers because of main namespace article/s about sandboxes, then it can be a disambiguation page. Ironically, Category:Sandboxes is already being used as a category destination (scroll down to see a list). I will make a similar proposal to User:Bencherlite for Category:Wikipedia sandboxes because it also would be easier to remember. Thanks. Nick Levinson (talk) 18:21, 3 August 2013 (UTC)
- While the CfD doesn't quite apply to this proposed use, I still think this would be a bad idea for the reason you mentioned, that thie really belongs at Category:Wikipedia sandboxes. Because the Wikipedia sandboxes category was speedily deleted as a test, you should be able to just recreate that one yourself, imho. – Philosopher Let us reason together. 19:05, 3 August 2013 (UTC)