User talk:Phonet
| This is Phonet's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Saekki has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Jack Frost (talk) 11:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for January 11[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Konglish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Work (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Agungi has been accepted[edit]
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
jcc (tea and biscuits) 19:31, 13 January 2018 (UTC)There is no source in your editing. Are you discriminating against Japan? Racial discrimination violates the terms of Wikipedia. -CHR52 (talk) 09:25, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @CHR52: Removing the images of taiyaki from the bungeo-ppang article isn't racism. The former article is mentioned and linked in the latter article. The yakiniku article doesn't have and doesn't need to have images of bulgogi and the chāhan article doesn't have and doesn't need to have images of chǎofàn. The same applies to the bungeo-ppang article. And again, please watch your tone (Wikipedia:No personal attacks). --Phonet (talk) 10:08, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. "Korean pears" do not exist in Japanese academic societies. Pears brought Japan to Korea. -CHR52 (talk) 10:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @CHR52: Well, Japanese academic societies aren't the only academia in the world. Also please note that common names are not necessarily the names used in academia. Plants and fruits are known by many names in various geographic areas. --Phonet (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- HaHaHa, "Well, Japanese academic societies aren't the only academia in the world. "? That is your subjectivity. You don't know the history Korea plagiarized from Japan.For example, Korean strawberries and Nori are all Japanese varieties. -CHR52 (talk) 10:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- If you have a belief, rewrite the Japanese version wikipedia. Do you have that much knowledge? If you can not do that, your claim is false. You are exactly the creator of "fake news". -CHR52 (talk) 11:03, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @CHR52: How is that my (or anyone's) subjectivity? What belief? Why would I edit Japanese Wikipedia? How can a country plagiarize history from another country? I have difficulties understanding your comments. I don't think you are expressing yourself clearly nor understanding what I'm saying. Please consider seeking help from Wikipedia:Embassy. If your native language is Japanese, the people listed in the section Wikipedia:Local Embassy#日本語 (ja) may help you better express what you want to say. --Phonet (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's sophistry If you have a belief, rewrite the Japanese version wikipedia. That's a Racism. -CHR52 (talk) 12:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @CHR52: Seriously, try visiting the Wikipedia:Embassy. There seems to be a language barrier. I know you are not accusing yourself but me of being racist, but your words are interpreted the other way around. --Phonet (talk) 21:51, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- That's sophistry If you have a belief, rewrite the Japanese version wikipedia. That's a Racism. -CHR52 (talk) 12:15, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @CHR52: How is that my (or anyone's) subjectivity? What belief? Why would I edit Japanese Wikipedia? How can a country plagiarize history from another country? I have difficulties understanding your comments. I don't think you are expressing yourself clearly nor understanding what I'm saying. Please consider seeking help from Wikipedia:Embassy. If your native language is Japanese, the people listed in the section Wikipedia:Local Embassy#日本語 (ja) may help you better express what you want to say. --Phonet (talk) 11:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- @CHR52: Well, Japanese academic societies aren't the only academia in the world. Also please note that common names are not necessarily the names used in academia. Plants and fruits are known by many names in various geographic areas. --Phonet (talk) 10:41, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. "Korean pears" do not exist in Japanese academic societies. Pears brought Japan to Korea. -CHR52 (talk) 10:28, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Phonet. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)