User talk:PickleG13

Nomination of Remembering Phil for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Remembering Phil is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remembering Phil until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Long Whip (December 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by BuySomeApples was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of books). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Can the sources be improved? AbeBooks and minutes from a racing commission meeting don't demonstrate notability and aren't really good sources for supporting information about the book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Long Whip and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

BuySomeApples (talk) 20:29, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Andrew W. Garroni[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Andrew W. Garroni, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Remembering Phil poster.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Remembering Phil poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:41, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hangovers & Hot Flashes for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hangovers & Hot Flashes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hangovers & Hot Flashes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:17, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Haunted by Heroes has been accepted[edit]

Haunted by Heroes, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BuySomeApples (talk) 16:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

First Edit Day[edit]

Happy First Edit Day, PickleG13, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Ezra Cricket (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Happy First Edit Day![edit]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Lewis (director) has been accepted[edit]

Kevin Lewis (director), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 05:41, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: In Defense of Joe Manchin (January 29)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There are a lot of references in this article, but as far as notability of the book itself is concerned, I don't see a single useful source - even the Kirkus review is Kirkus Indie (this is paid coverage, and not independent). Watch out for WP:REFBOMB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:In Defense of Joe Manchin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 08:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PickleG13! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! asilvering (talk) 08:25, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hangovers & Hot Flashes book cover.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hangovers & Hot Flashes book cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:19, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulina Constancia[edit]

Hello, PickleG13,

It looks like you created this page on December 31st but you never added it to the daily AFD log page. A bot eventually did this for you on January 16th so the discussion existed for 2 weeks without any editors being aware of it and participating.

I really recommend that you start using Twinkle for tagging articles, redirects, categories, etc, for deletion. Just remember to set your Twinkle Preferences to "Notify page creator". Then when you start another AFD discussion, the article will be tagged, the AFD page created, the article creator will be notified and the AFD will be posted to the daily log so that editors will know about it. If you don't want to use Twinkle, then please follow the AFD guidelines to a "T" and complete all of the steps. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:54, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for pointing this out, Liz! I felt like I messed something up with that article, so I'm glad that you told me what I did wrong. PickleG13 (talk) 03:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: To Find a Killer has been accepted[edit]

To Find a Killer, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

CNMall41 (talk) 21:47, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Genöcide[edit]

Hello, PickleG13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Genöcide, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, PickleG13. Thank you for your work on Andrew W. Garroni. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start. To put this on more solid wp:notability grounds suggest finding 1-2 sources that cover him in depth and adding material derived from them. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 14:46, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hello, PickleG13. Thank you for your work on Sneakerasers. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 03:22, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Dora Romano" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]

The redirect Dora Romano has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 7 § Dora Romano until a consensus is reached. Asqueladd (talk) 16:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Long Whip has been accepted[edit]

The Long Whip, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk|contribs) 03:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]

Hi PickleG13. Thank you for your work on James Edward Hopkins. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:05, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]