User talk:PintoBean04

Endorsements[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I noticed that one of your added endorsements to the Joe Biden 2020 endorsements did not meet the endorsement standard of Wikipedia. Please refrain from adding any endorsements based solely off of one post or tweet on social media. However, if there is an article or other source that supports this endorsement, feel free to add it back. Also, feel free to reach out to me if you need any help or have any questions. Happy editing! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 23:45, 5 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Lima Bean Farmer. I appreciate you letting me know about this. I’m new to Wikipedia and from now on will be mindful not to add twitter endorsements. Although I don’t necessarily understand why this is the case, I will follow the rules :D. Once again, thanks for reaching out to make the correction! PintoBean04 (talk) 00:33, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! I’m glad to hear that you’re willing to improve, that’s what editing here is all about. I find the rule to be odd myself, but I try to enforce it so that we keep our endorsement pages clean. Feel free to reach out to me anytime in the future if you need help as well! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 01:48, 6 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! You seemed to be going well there after I explained to you about not adding social media endorsements. You repeatedly have added Evan McMullin using a YouTube source. I ask you again, please stop adding social media endorsements. Once again, you can reach out to me if you have any questions. Thank you! Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 03:52, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I have seen multiple people using YouTube as a credible endorsement as you clearly see in the video, Evan McMullin is endorsing Joe Biden. I only re-added the endorsement once, by the way. I did not see anywhere in the rules that a YouTube source cannot be used. I would like to re-add the McMullin endorsement because of the fact that it is a video where he is clearly saying to support Joe Biden. Thanks PintoBean04 (talk) 13:05, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop re adding YouTube as an endorsement. All youtube endorsements should be deleted for 2 reasons: first, it is considered social media which is not a reliable source for an endorsement. second, youtube can easily have digitally altered footage. Even our own president has altered footage. There must be a credible third party article to add this. Please stop adding this. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 19:08, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please let me add the endorsement. The footage isn’t doctored and if you look at the YouTube channel it is a news source. Instead of deleting it immeditaley and threatening to report me please look at the actual video. I would like to add the endorsement. PintoBean04 (talk) 20:35, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m glad that you’d like to add it, but you can not add it without a reliable source. Youtube is almost never a reliable source but most definitely not for an endorsement. It is not a matter of the video itself, it’s a matter of the source it’s from. There should be an independent article from a reliable source stating this endorsement is verified. However, I can not stop you from adding it. I can only warn you. It’s up to you what you do with your account and the policies that you decide to follow. Lima Bean Farmer (talk) 20:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:47, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]