User talk:PiracyFundsTerrorism
Great work on the Anniemal article! I would emphasize the Internet buzz a little more (maybe in a couple more sentences), to mention how some of the interest in the album was fan-driven, from music blogs. This article mentions it, and so does this one.
Also, the Critical Reception section could be seen as biased because it doesn't say much about negative criticisms, like how Annie's voice is "thin" and some critics felt that was detrimental, and also there were more than a few critics who called the album "overrated" (this is already mentioned but maybe could be broken out into its own paragraph with other negative criticisms). There were maybe one or two reviews I have seen that dismissed the album as having no substance and just being the same old pop music inundating the radio. Maybe not a valid criticism but it might be worth including also. Overall it might be good to have a separate paragraph for the negative criticisms.
There were quite a few remixes done for the singles from the album, so it might be good to talk about those in the article, although maybe that's not in the scope of this article.
If I think of any other things I will let you know! - carolyn81 (user • talk) 18:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (File:SomeGirlsHenri.jpg)[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:SomeGirlsHenri.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:21, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:TheGreatestHit.ogg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:TheGreatestHit.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:14, 22 March 2018 (UTC)