User talk:PittChEGSA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have created a new account User:TimKnab, on the recommendation of the help desk and I would like to have Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/University of Pittsburgh Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering deleted so that I may resubmit this article with the suggested improvements from that account as I understand this account was blocked because it appears to represent an organization, however, I was the only one with the login information to this account, and the new account which I would prefer to use and submit/edit from is also my own personal account which will only ever be used by me. Thanks PittChEGSA (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing stopping your from working on the article was your new account, and this would be the preferred method as it means the submission's page history remains intact. If you still want the submission to be deleted reply here and I'll tag it for you. Alternatively you can add "{{db-g7|rationale=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:PittChEGSA&diff=prev&oldid=504280126}}" (WP:CSD#G7) above all the other content in the submission. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 02:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to do that, however the page was immediately (automatically?) rejected due to the fact that the page existed, and as it was explained to me via live chat, that was due to the fact that the exact same page was created under a different user account. So if you could flag/tag the page for deletion that would be really great, and I would really appreciate it. Thanks again, PittChEGSA (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2012

Hi, I have deleted the page for you. If you need the content, I'm happy to email it to you. I'm 'watching' this page for any replies but may not be able get back to you for 30 hours or so. Kind regards, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:53, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have the content saved in a text file so I think I'm all set on that front. Thanks again, everyone for all the help and the quick responses and action! PittChEGSA (talk) 09:19 21 August 2012

Image source problem with File:Pitt ChemE Chairs New.png[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Pitt ChemE Chairs New.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:PittChemElogo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 06:48, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]