User talk:PixelGroup

March 2021[edit]

Hello PixelGroup. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:PixelGroup. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=PixelGroup|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 19:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:33, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PixelGroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

tskhadadze.shako (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I'm not receiving any compensation for my contributions, I'm here just to help people get correct information from Wikipedia pages and I understand the reason for blocking my account clearly. I made a mistake choosing username which belongs to the company and I'll not make any kind of edit with this company name or never use it elsewhere on Wikipedia. I'll take responsibility for my edits, won't violate any copyright or other laws and will support civil environment

Decline reason:

This directly contradicts your claim here. Yamla (talk) 14:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PixelGroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My claim was written by mistake and I won't repeat it in the future. I'm cancelling my claim and I'll do my best to fix this. Please change my username, unblock my account and I'll continue making contributions without violating any Wikipedia or other laws. Thanks!

Decline reason:

We believed you the first time; that was sufficient. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:39, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PixelGroup (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, I've claimed account approval long before I get known to Wikipedia paid rules. It was my mistake and my problem, I agree with it, but now only I want is to continue editing and writing good articles. I don't make money from Wikipedia and definitely don't want. It was just a mistake, trust me, I'll not make any further problems for you, I just want make Wikipedia better for readers from my country ( Georgia ). Thanks in advance and sorry again!

Decline reason:

You did not claim by mistake that you are performing digital marketing services; your "mistake" as you see it was getting caught in doing so and not realizing you would be prevented from editing. To add to this insult of our intelligence you then outright contradict yourself. We can now no longer trust what you say, and as such I am declining your request. As I think that further requests will be unproductive, I am removing your access to this page. You may make further appeals via WP:UTRS, but I suggest that you wait a long time before doing so. 331dot (talk) 10:44, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Either you lied before or you are lying now. Either way, you are demonstrating we cannot trust you to speak truthfully. That means we'll probably have to leave you blocked. --Yamla (talk) 23:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]