User talk:Pk0001

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruby Rachel Kendrick

Hello Pk0001,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Ruby Rachel Kendrick for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 14:02, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Ubiquity, thanks , I understand your considering.

Proposed deletion of Alladi–Grinstead constant

The article Alladi–Grinstead constant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article lacks a lede sentence, and, as a result, it doesn't state what it is about. It doesn't say what the Alladi-Grinstead constant is.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:33, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Alladi–Grinstead constant for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alladi–Grinstead constant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alladi–Grinstead constant until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:09, 1 May 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Robert McClenon, I understand your considering.

Proposed deletion of Lueroth constant

The article Lueroth constant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This merely repeats statements made on our page for the "Alladi-Grinstead constant", which was itself deleted in May.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. XOR'easter (talk) 16:01, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

• Thanks for your good job , It's

Ok. I consider your considering , have a nice day. XOR'easter Pk0001 (talk) 04:25, 28 June 2017 (UTC)