User talk:Pkbwcgs/Archive/January 2019

Happy New Year, Pkbwcgs!

Happy New Year!

Pkbwcgs,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Hhkohh (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Your BRFA

Hello, your recent BRFA (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 16) has been approved. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 14:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Articles for Semi-Protection/Normani Kordei

That article is old I am done with it. Just delete it I do not care anymore. It has been over a year ago. Let someone else manage the page I do not care. The whole thing can be deleted for all I care. Just delete it or whatever or let someone else take care of it. I moved on to other things like editing other pages.--Welcometothenewmillenium (talk) 17:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

Do you wish the same for Wikipedia:Articles for Semi-Protection/Dinah Jane and Wikipedia:Articles for Semi-Protection/Normani Kordei/Dinah Jane? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 18:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

City Thameslink

Just a quick note, I have fleshed out the article a bit more so it's worth another look. I realise this is your first GA review, so I just wanted to say you're going about things exactly the right way - suggesting improvements and checking the article is well-written, factually accurate, broad in coverage and doesn't have any copyvios. The "broad in coverage" criteria does seem to get left out of reviews, so it's good to see it pick up attention here. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 18:15, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Underpopulated template

Hi, I see your bot request to remove instances of the {{Underpopulated category}} following a consensus to delete in TfD, but someone or some bot has been removing them as the transclusion count has been continually dropping. It's confusing to me since it seems you had started a process to perform the removal but the template is being removed despite your initiative to handle it. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:48, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

User:BsherrAWBBOT is doing it. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Strangeness with ISBN page updates

This is curious. When your bot updates Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia/ISBN errors, it typically adds or removes a few hundred bytes each day. But when WikiCleanerBot updates the page, the net change is ten or twenty thousand bytes. I have poked around at page histories for the pages that are added, and I really have no idea why that would be. – Jonesey95 (talk) 08:53, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jonesey95: This is quite strange but I think User:NicoV adds new algorithms that can find more ISBN errors and my WPCleaner is only basic so it can't identify those errors. Pkbwcgs (talk) 15:54, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jonesey95 and Pkbwcgs: This is normal, it's just that I'm only updating the list of ISBN errors just after a dump analysis (which updates pages like Wikipedia:CHECKWIKI/WPC 069 dump). The dump analysis lets WPCleaner find ISBN errors that are not found by other tools (CW, templates checking ISBN...), that's why it makes a big difference. --NicoV ^{(Talk on frwiki)} 17:22, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Great Work! came across your bot on my watchlist, and was surprised that I had never noticed such a quality editor as yourself Eddie891 Talk Work 17:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

@Eddie891: Thanks. I appreciate it. Pkbwcgs (talk) 17:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)

Your BRFA

Hello Pkbwcgs, your BRFA (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 20) has been approved. Happy editing, — xaosflux ^Talk 20:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Your BRFA

Hello Pkbwcgs, your BRFA (Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/PkbwcgsBot 18) has been approved. Happy editing, TheSandDoctor ^Talk 18:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)