User talk:Placenamehere5849
Your draft article, Draft:Jo-Anna Sue Henley Rampas[edit]
Hello, Placenamehere5849. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jo-Anna Sue Henley Rampas".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 01:07, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Prime Ministers[edit]
Re this edit and others: you have made a large number of edits, such as saying that Margaret Thatcher was the 72nd Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, without providing a reliable source. I don't doubt that this may be true, but it must have a source.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 11:59, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
I question the relevance and the accuracy of the information. It is far from clear who was the first prime minister, and so it is far from clear who was the 72nd. Besides, these numbers do not tell us anything useful. Surtsicna (talk) 12:08, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- It's more usually found with US Presidents, eg Donald Trump is described in the infobox as the 45th President of the United States, which isn't controversial. There seems to have been an attempt to do something similar with UK Prime Ministers, but they are not usually described in this way and there may be original research here.--♦IanMacM♦ (talk to me) 14:28, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- There is no lack of certainty about the identities or terms of American presidents but there is considerable doubt over British prime ministers and there is no official numbering system so to try and introduce one is definitely original research. For what it's worth, Johnson is probably the 55th person to hold the office (which was itself unofficial until the 1900s), but not definitely so, and that number doesn't take into account the non-consecutive terms of Gladstone, Baldwin, Churchill, Wilson and others. I agree that the numbers are not at all useful. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
- Here in the US, with a much shorter history than that of the UK, we do count Presidents, and make use of the number fairly often in all sorts of official and unofficial ways. We also have a settled way of dealing with Grover Cleveland's non-consecutive terms - I don't know who decided it, but no one argues that Cleveland wasn't the 22nd and 24th President. Other polities don't seem to do that, even Germany, where Bismarck's status as the first Chancellor is (as far as I know) uncontested, and it's easy enough to count from there. As for "usefullness", I dunno, we're human, we like to count things. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
- There is no lack of certainty about the identities or terms of American presidents but there is considerable doubt over British prime ministers and there is no official numbering system so to try and introduce one is definitely original research. For what it's worth, Johnson is probably the 55th person to hold the office (which was itself unofficial until the 1900s), but not definitely so, and that number doesn't take into account the non-consecutive terms of Gladstone, Baldwin, Churchill, Wilson and others. I agree that the numbers are not at all useful. No Great Shaker (talk) 19:34, 10 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Presidents of Nintendo for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Presidents of Nintendo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
WaddlesJP13 (talk | contributions) 18:23, 5 August 2021 (UTC)