User talk:Planetjes
Your recent edit to JES (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:25, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I had to reverse the change you made to the JES page. The article you replaced already has a purpose, as a disambiguation page. If you believe that the singer Jes Brieden meets Wikipedia's notability standards for music, then the appropriate place for the article would be Jes Brieden. Please note that Wikipedia articles are required to be written in a neutral point of view. The article I just removed reads far too much like an advertisement or a press release. If you are Jes Brieden, then you should read Wikipedia:Autobiography. Because of the difficulty of writing about yourself in a neutral way, autobiographical articles are strongly discouraged. -- Jim Douglas (talk) (contribs) 02:31, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Image tagging for Image:DSC00322w.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:DSC00322w.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
your recent edits[edit]
Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. JoeSmack Talk 07:20, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
notability[edit]
i'm sorry; you need to cite notability in your article with some verifiable notable external sources. this in essence is the best way to keep an artist's article on wikipedia (cause wikipedia sees a loooooot of bullcrap, ya know?). cheers. JoeSmack Talk 07:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- well, i'd go first with things that also are in print (link tot he online version). this could mean rollingstone, this could mean NYtimes. JoeSmack Talk 08:00, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- first i'd talk about how you plan to add some verifiable/notable external sources on the talk page (you asked to 'hangon' to the article, thats where you'd say why), and do it sooner rather than later (like today more than tomorrow or the next). good luck. cheers. JoeSmack Talk 08:04, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
more on JES[edit]
Your doing great! I went through an added a little formatting to the article, spit and shine stuff. The next step i'd suggest is using in-line citations. You can do this by adding <ref>[http://www.example.com Example citation]</ref> to the front of facts you cite, and then adding <references /> once to the references section (er, make the references section too). this will really help your article because one can trace each fact back to its source without having to read all of them. JoeSmack Talk 08:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
oh, and make a userpage. stick around for a while with us on wikipedia, your doing great for a beginner! JoeSmack Talk 08:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
Spam account for manager of performer called jes[edit]
- Why can't I edit Wikipedia?
Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
- Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?
Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
- What can I do now?
If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
- Add the text
{{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}}on your user talk page. - Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
- Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
- Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
- Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. --Orange Mike | Talk 14:55, 5 September 2013 (UTC)