User talk:Playmaker fans

This is Playmaker fans's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playmaker Capital (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playmaker Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Playmaker Capital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 15:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Playmaker fans! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:12, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playmaker Capital (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please remove all external links, we don't use them in the body of an article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playmaker Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Playmaker Capital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:31, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playmaker Capital (July 15)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playmaker Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Playmaker Capital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 18:45, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I was just told to remove all of my external links in the body of the article and now I'm being told that I there aren't sufficient references. Please advise how I get this approved and published. Playmaker fans (talk) 18:47, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are confusing external links with references; please read Referencing for beginners.

You seem very invested in this draft for a mere fan. If you work for this company, the Terms of Use require you to make a formal paid editing disclosure. This company is not entitled to a Wikipedia article(not a "page", a subtle but important distinction) merely because it exists. A Wikipedia article about a company must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. Press releases, announcements of routine business activities like the raising of capital, brief mentions, and staff interviews do not establish notability. Please read Your First Article.

Promotional text like "Playmaker Capital Inc. is a digital sports media company that lives at the intersection of sports, gambling, media, and technology" must be removed. 331dot (talk) 20:07, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you for the clarification. I am going to add references throughout this article to ensure that it can be approved and published.

Yes, I do work for this company and I believe I had selected to disclose that information. Is it not clear that I did select to disclose that I work for the company? If not please advise how to do so. Playmaker fans (talk) 14:37, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Playmaker fans, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Playmaker fans|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 14:51, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Playmaker Capital has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Playmaker Capital. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:52, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing yet again[edit]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Theroadislong (talk) 13:51, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. This is the first sentence of the page:

"This user, in accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, discloses that they have been paid by {{{Playmaker Capital Inc.}}} for their contributions to Wikipedia."

If that is not sufficient can you please direct me to doing it properly? Playmaker fans (talk) 13:54, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As you told above you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Playmaker fans, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Playmaker fans|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Theroadislong (talk) 13:56, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. That should now be complete. Please advise wether this disclosure is sufficient. Playmaker fans (talk) 19:27, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playmaker Capital (July 19)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

User has still not made the correct paid editing disclosure on their user page.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playmaker Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Playmaker Capital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 13:52, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Playmaker Capital has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Playmaker Capital. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playmaker Capital (July 21)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Playmaker Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:50, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Playmaker Capital (July 28)[edit]

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Ingenuity was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Aside from a couple small wording changes, nothing has been changed over the last two declines. As this has been declined five times without addressing the issues raised by the reviewers it's just becoming a waste of our time. As Theroadislong noted, all of the references are just routine coverage, acquisitions, investments, etc.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 17:28, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for more clarification but never got a response. I apologize for the continued submissions, but I am unclear as to why we cannot be included. I have added 10 references from publications, both print and digital.

In order to eventually be approved and deemed notable for inclusion on Wikipedia, what needs to be added/changed? Is the only thing that we need more references? I look at a page like The Action Network and I don't see a ton of difference between it and Playmaker Capital Inc.'s

Again, thank you for your feedback. Playmaker fans (talk) 19:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. You have not demonstrated that the company meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable company. We don't want a summary of routine business activities. There must be independent sources that go in depth about the significance or influence of the company. 331dot (talk) 20:43, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Playmaker Capital[edit]

Hello, Playmaker fans. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Playmaker Capital, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Playmaker Capital[edit]

Hello, Playmaker fans. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Playmaker Capital".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]