User talk:Polkanov4

Where is the definitive rules and policies page? Polkanov4 (talk) 06:48, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useful Wikipedia:User access levels Polkanov4 (talk) 08:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback[edit]

This primer is a good start for learning guidelines about editing and other stuff. Don't worry so much about learning all the rules-- just focus on what you want to do right now.

I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 15:56, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Polkanov4, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} (note: not a bot!) 16:29, 5 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sock-puppet case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Kaz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.--Toddy1 (talk) 14:00, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meatpuppetry[edit]

Although I don't consider myself a "puppet" of any sort, but I am sorry to discover that apparently I come under the category "Meatpuppet". I did not know that rushing to someone's aid was prohibited on wikipedia. I have learned my lesson and would like to appeal the block please. Polkanov4 (talk) 20:38, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one called you a meatpuppet. You were blocked because a Checkuser demonstrated that you are a technical Confirmed match for Kaz [1] which was backed by behavioral evidence linking you two, resulting in my blocking you for being Kaz, abusively using another account, ie: sockpuppeting. Anyone who would even consider an unblock would best be served by consulting the checkuser in this situation, as the results were unambiguous, both technical and behavioral. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 21:09, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do I have to email you some pics of my breasts like Toddy1 before you will take my side Dennis? She has you quite wrapped around her little finger doesn't she? :\ Polkanov4 (talk) 21:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is there anyone other than biased Dennis Brown that I can appeal to which does not require sexual favors? Yes I am questioning his integrity as an admin. Is raising a question also prohibited on wikipedia? Is freedom of speech also prohibited? Who checks the integrity of admins here? Or is there no check-and balance system? Does everyone just close rank when concerns are raised? Polkanov4 (talk) 21:42, 17 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No one is going to see what you are writing here unless you use a proper unblock template. Read WP:GAB. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 16:22, 18 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked[edit]

Given that the evidence that this is a sock is strong, and your abuse above, I am revoking your access to edit this talk page. Further appeals will only be heard through the Unblock Ticket Request System. — Coren ^(talk) 00:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

פנייתך בקשר לעליית קראי מזרח אירופה לארץ[edit]

Neria Haroeh Subject: פנייתך בקשר לעליית קראי מזרח אירופה לארץ

אדון נכבד, שלום רב, מועצת החכמים, ו/או כל גוף אחר של היהדות הקראית העולמית (ע"ר), מעולם לא פעלו כדי למנוע עלייה לארץ של קראי מזרח אירופה.איננו מתנגדים לעליה כזאת, ואנו אף מעודדים אותה. אבקש לדעת את מקור השמועות, מי הפיץ אותן? היכן? ועל רקע איזה נסיבות?אודה על עזרתך על מנת למנוע הפצת דברי לא נכונים. בכבוד רב ובברכה,נריה הרואה

_______________________

עו"ד נריה בן ברוך הרואה

יו"ר המועצה העליונה

היהדות הקראית העולמית (ע"ר)

נייד: 050-6909535

פקס: 072-231982 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.166.32.218 (talk) 12:44, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]