User talk:PoxVox

March 2021[edit]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Ram Vilas Paswan. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Do not spam "https://www.thethinkera.com/". Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, ParthNarolaofficial, does not meet our username policy. Your username is the principal reason for the block. You are welcome to continue editing after you have selected a new username that meets the username policy guidelines, which are summarized below.

Per the username policy, a username should represent an individual and should not: represent a group or organization; be promotional; be misleading (such as indicating possession of special user rights or being a "Bot" account (unless approved for such purposes)); be offensive or otherwise disruptive. However, a username that contains the name of a organization and also identifies you individually, such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87" is allowed, though, among others, the guidance on conflict of interest and the policy of paid-contribution disclosure are relevant.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.

{{unblock|Assuming that so far no special argument or proof has been made from me regarding sockpuppetry but now the matter of sockpuppetry is being taken seriously. As you will block the account, I guarantee that there will be no such mistake or misunderstanding from me regarding sockpuppetry. PoxVox (talk) 05:35, 22 March 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice.

Deb (talk) 13:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Because we are editing in same internet connection so, wikipedia representative found same IP address

Decline reason:

We don't know your IP address, that's not why you were blocked. Please see the notice above. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{unblock|1=It will not happen in-future Please sir activate my accountParthNarolaofficial (talk) 09:44, 10 March 2021 (UTC). Please see the notice above. 331dot (talk) 09:16, 10 March 2021 (UTC)} I have fixed your request for proper display; prior requests must remain until the block is removed. You are only blocked for your username. Please propose a new username to be unblocked. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Parth Narola (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Decline reason:

No. Pick a username that complies with WP:USERNAME. Yamla (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There's a pre-existing account, ParthNarola (talk · contribs) - Cabayi (talk) 13:18, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Parth A Narola (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Sorry I misunderstood the block notice. I am not very good with English. Here is a new name which I prefer instead of current one. ParthNarolaofficial (talk) 05:59, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Adding a letter A does not make the username ok. If you have not already, read WP:PROMONAME. PhilKnight (talk) 09:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-un|Narola Parth|reason=Sorry I misunderstood the block notice. I am not very good with English. Here is a new name which I prefer instead of current one.}} Reversing the order of the name does not make it acceptable. You need to choose something very different as your username. If English is not your primary language, you may wish to edit the version of Wikipedia that is in your primary language. 331dot (talk) 08:37, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

PoxVox (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

Sorry I misunderstood the block notice. Here is a new name which I prefer instead of the current one. Kindly rename my name as soon as

Accept reason:

I have renamed your account and will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 10:51, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Nizil Shah. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Gopal Italia have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Please do not add links from Thinkera.com because it does not qualify as reliable source per WP:RS. It seems that you are associated with the website and trying to promote the website. Nizil (talk) 07:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Printed circuit board. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Constant314 (talk) 14:37, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Payal Ghosh, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Stop adding Thinkera.com as a reference as it is not WP:RS. Nizil (talk) 05:13, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Chintan Patoliya (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This was not promotional information but the context was not promotional and I was misunderstood about this. This will not happen again.PoxVox (talk) 05:11, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This does not address the sockpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 09:33, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

We are working from the same place and from the same WiFi so this can happen. This has happened to us before. PoxVox (talk) 10:22, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Decline reason:

More than that, editing the same articles and making word-for-word the same unblock request. Even without the technical evidence, this is a clear violation of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 11:04, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the second time that my account has been blocked. It may be that I have violated Wikipedia's policies several times. So far, I have pointed this out. I should and should have contributed to Wikipedia in my own way. So thank you in the hope that you will hear my appeal and unblock my account soon.

Decline reason:

You still haven't addressed the sockpuppetry. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 14:32, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PoxVox (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Assuming that so far no special argument or proof has been made from me regarding sockpuppetry but now the matter of sockpuppetry is being taken seriously. As you will unblock my account, I guarantee that there will be no such mistake or misunderstanding from me regarding sockpuppetry. PoxVox (talk) 1:37 am, 22 March 2021, Monday (8 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked to engage in further promotion following your spam. Revoking TPA. GeneralNotability (talk) 01:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2021[edit]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

GeneralNotability (talk) 01:08, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]