User talk:Pradoec

Hello there.

Unigo[edit]

I've seen no evidence that this new website is notable yet; I can find nothing about it in the New York Times or Forbes. Notability is defined as "... has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. Trivial or incidental coverage of a subject by secondary sources is not sufficient to establish notability." (emphasis added) --Orange Mike | Talk 13:54, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The NYT piece is good, solid stuff; don't know why neither of these is showing up on GoogleNews. The Forbes is a smidgen weaker, but still helps; Mashable is a bit iffier, as a blog. Definitely use the Chronicle (whether it's available online or not) if it's substantial. I've removed the "salting" from Unigo, so you should be able to create a new article. Good luck! --Orange Mike | Talk 16:43, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Unigo Organization Logo.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Unigo Organization Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:33, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]