User talk:Prairiefire2

In response to your feedback[edit]

Hi - Welcome back! Below the edit window is a line (just above the save button) to enter the edit summary. See WP:ES for more detail.

Ariconte (talk) 07:00, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Election audits has been accepted[edit]

Election audits, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 17:48, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

article on election audits[edit]

Thanks for creating and maintaining the Election audits article. It covers a lot of ground, and I thought the differences among states were important enough to have a table of comparisons, based on VerifiedVoting and NCSL, which I added today. Numbersinstitute (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the addition. I hung back from including such detailed information because I didn't feel comfortable making the commitment to keep that amount of 50-state detail up-to-date. I hope you'll stick around to do that! Again, thanks. Prairiefire2 (talk) 20:53, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'll try to keep it up to date. I posted a question on Talk:Election_audits. Can you clarify that situation at all? Numbersinstitute (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]