User talk:Prayer for the wild at heart

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:Imperial HRH2[edit]

You lack legitimacy and are not part of any of the official Football forums supporting the development of pages. Furthermore, I have received word from others on the forum that you are a known Barcelona "sockpuppet", hence all your future edits on FC Barcelona maybe reverted citing POV issues. Thank you. Imperial HRH2 (talk) 13:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have you received word from the others what this week's winning lotto numbers will be? Prayer for the wild at heart (talk) 17:25, 12 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Prayer for the wild at heart. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of James Haven for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article James Haven, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Haven until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]