Please read WP:SOCK. You are obviously Premknutsford25 (talk·contribs) and you've already started making the same poor edits you were making to the B. R. Ambedkar article under that former name. The chances are, you've forgotten your password but you need somehow to demonstrate the link between the two accounts and you need not to edit war on stuff where you were previously shown not to have consensus. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 09:37, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
your message is nothing but the personal attack, not acceptable Premknutsford (talk) 09:41, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
So, you are saying that you are not Premknutsford25? Credit me with some sense, please. You've been going at that article hammer-and-tongs since last year and I rather suspect you have also been going at it while logged out. You've been through various discussions, including at WP:DRN and you really, really need to take a step back here. There are circumstances where it is ok to have alternate accounts but you've been playing fast and loose with our policies for a long time and numerous very experienced contributors have been involved in trying to explain how we work. Competence is required to edit Wikipedia. - Sitush (talk) 09:58, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I had requested you, again last time requesting you to not to make any personal attack.Premknutsford (talk) 10:05, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent editing history at B. R. Ambedkar shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Sitush (talk) 09:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please explicitly choose one account: Premknutsford (talk·contribs) or Premknutsford25 (talk·contribs), and stop edit-warring: the other account was blocked for edit-warring on the same topic, so you should know better. I will suspend the editing privileges of one of these accounts so that you remain within Wikipedia policies on alternate accounts. Acroterion(talk) 11:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please do watch the page of Dr.Ambedkar as I can see some people are mischievous.
They still have the low Idiotic caste mentality in their mind. I have seen the hatred particularly in Bladesmulti and other users. 101.59.165.176 (talk) 13:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
