User talk:Princess Derpy

feel free to leave me a message

my userpage[edit]

thanks for fixing that for me. -badmachine 08:43, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents[edit]

There have, to date, been two responses to your recent message at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. You can see them both here, if you like. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:07, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Philippe (WMF) (talk • contribs)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

- Rklawton (talk) 01:05, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Princess Derpy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for the userpage joke, however, if you look through my contributions, you will see nothing "disruptive" but rather quality edits. I apologize for not taking the time to look over the userpage guidelines and thus this incident happened. At the same time, I feel that one "disruptive" edit that I later removed (before the complaint showed up) is not enough to warrant a block Thank you for listening, Princess Derpy (talk) 01:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I think you are far too dangerous to the project to unblock. Your userpage went beyond the pale, exposing any visitor to the page to possible risk. And it was done so intentionally. No claim of ignorance of our userpage policy explains such a malicious act, and yet you simply apologize for the "joke". -- Atama頭 01:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note to reviewing admin[edit]

I would strongly object to an unblock for the following reasons:

this editor's account is less than two weeks old, though the user is clearly an experienced editor
this editor's user page edits are so over-the-top as to create a blatantly hostile collaborative environment
this editor's claims to "not knowing user page policy" are disingenuous as the edits are so blatantly inappropriate that one does not need to read policy to know they are wrong.
indef blocking this user poses no foreseeable detriment to the project, whereas unblocking this user does. Rklawton (talk) 01:48, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i'll try this again[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Princess Derpy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to clarify that Last Measure™ contains no malware whatsoever. Additionally, I'd like to point out that, before the issue was brought up on ANI, I had removed the link from my userpage as I too felt was inappropriate. I don't see why I am being blocked over a revision that I chose to remove (once again, before an issue was made of it), because another blocked editor snooped around my userpage history. Princess Derpy (talk) 02:02, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am reasonably familiar with Last Measure. It may not fit the strict definition of malware, but tricking users into visiting it is still absolutely unacceptable. Carnildo (talk) 03:00, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This appeal does not address any of the four points I've made above. It does, however provide an excellent example of WP:Baiting. Rklawton (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would advise that the block remain in effect. Flutter shy !xmcuvg2MH 02:53, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user, editing as User:88.208.208.182 has begun retaliating, so I'm blocking all remaining privileges. Rklawton (talk) 03:17, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Pickbothmanlol for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 01:44, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]