User talk:Prithviraj2002

Finding Fanny

Hi! I just wanted to ask why it was reported before that the movie was a Konkoni/English film? AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 10:15, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Can you reply to me here?!? You're violating Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy, that says that you are not supposed to add material to a page with bias. You just added that the film is "absurdly entertaining"...that IS bias!! Also, you are adding copyrighted content, from the production house...that is also not allowed. Stop reverting me or you could be blocked! AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 05:42, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

The content that is being added is not being copyrighted by the production house. As official representatives we are positioned to give out the right communication to users. While we can remove 'entertaining' from the plot, everything else will remain the same. The plot synopsis given now is not verified or official. We are drafting an official synopsis that will go to the media and that will be uploaded in a day or two. Hope this makes it clear Prithviraj2002 (talk) 05:58, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

But that's not how you write synonpses on Wikipedia. What's wrong with the one we have now? It tells the actual plot of the movie AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 06:04, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Could you please tell me from where have you got this synopsis? Which verified source has this synopsis? Nothing of the movie is out officially from the production house and studio. Hence the synopsis is not verified. I would really appreciate if this constant reverts is stopped, when we have urged and repeatedly said, that as official representatives, we have the right communication to send out of the film, and we have the official media synopsis in a day or two. Prithviraj2002 (talk) 06:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

This is where I got it from- from the director himself AB01 ^{I'M A POTATO} 07:29, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Finding Fanny. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- KRIMUK90 ✉ 06:32, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Mr X Theatrical Poster.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Mr X Theatrical Poster.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:05, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Prithviraj2002. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Miss Tanakpur Haazir Ho, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Diff: [1] In this edit, your comment "Producer as per credits in end slate is Vinay Tiwari. Crossword Films is the production house involved, but legally Vinay Tiwari gets credited as producer" would suggest that you have inside knowledge of this film, and that you might have a conflict of interest. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 02:17, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

hello. I think I inadvertently gave the wrong impression that I have an external relationship with the producer. I got the end credits from the slate trailer which is up for public viewing on Youtube. However, in full disclosure, we handle the social media for Fox Star Studios, and its in our interest that the right info goes out to the public, in an absolutely impartial manner as per the guidelines of the Wikipedia. Hope this clarifies.