User talk:ProManglementer

Twinkle[edit]

Hi ProManglementer, I noticed you participate in counter vandalism activities and you might already be aware of Twinkle but thought I would drop you a note just in case. If you are not familiar, Twinkle is a gadget you can install in your preferences which makes reverting and leaving talk page template messages much easier. :) S0091 (talk) 19:14, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@S0091: Thanks, it seems very useful. Hopefully it should make anti-vandalism edits a lot easier. ProManglementer (talk) 19:43, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Misuse of Twinkle[edit]

You just now reverted using Twinkle. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=University_of_Michigan_School_of_Public_Health&diff=prev&oldid=911276555

But you incorrectly asserted that I had failed to give an adequate explanation. That is clearly false. Please take a look again. And please be more careful when using Twinkle. --2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF (talk) 19:58, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF: A lack of Wikipedia article does not neccesarily mean that a person is not notable. As Assari is ranked 4th on Publons, a well-used website for tracking peer reviews, he does appear to be notable. ProManglementer (talk) 20:10, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No - but to be on such a list, one must have appropriate indicia of WP notability. See WP:N. An article reflects notability. Or RS coverage that meets GNG or other WP-accepted notability criteria. Publons ranking is not included in such criteria. You are not supposed to restore material deleted because of lack of notability criteria without proper support - which you lack. Further - your use of Twinkle charging inaccurately that a reason was not provided for the deletion is not the way to go; you have to be more careful. 2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF (talk) 20:15, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF: According to criterion 3 of Wikipedia's notability criteria for academics Asseri is considered notable due to being a fellow of NYAM. This can be verified by the NYAM's fellows directory. ProManglementer (talk) 20:26, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no - that is not license to consider notable anyone belonging to any organization that calls itself an academy. Only one that is a highly selective and prestigious scholarly society or association or a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor. NYAM is nothing of the sort. It is a three-thousand fellows advocacy organization. 2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF (talk) 20:40, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF: I now understand why Assari should not be counted as notable and I agree that he should not be on the list of notable alumni. ProManglementer (talk) 21:06, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. 2604:2000:E010:1100:FD72:21A0:C172:76CF (talk) 22:28, 17 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar[edit]

The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar

Congratulations, ProManglementer

You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefield^{seeking new name},
a crowdsource counter-vandalism patrol and label tool (http://battlefield.wikiloop.org)
for the week ending at 2020-03-01.

On behalf of the team and community of WikiLoop Battlefield and as Wikipedians, we like to appreciate your contributions, and look forward for more in the future. Also don't forget to bring your Wikipedian friends who you think are also passionate of keeping Wikipedia protected.
Cheers, xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:52, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiLoop Battlefield monthly barnstar[edit]

The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar

Congratulations, ProManglementer

You have been recognized as the monthly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefield^{seeking new name},
a crowdsource counter-vandalism patrol and label tool (http://battlefield.wikiloop.org)
for the month ending at 2020-03-01.

On behalf of the team and community of WikiLoop Battlefield and as Wikipedians, we like to appreciate your contributions, and look forward for more in the future. Also don't forget to bring your Wikipedian friends who you think are also passionate of keeping Wikipedia protected.
Cheers, xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 04:57, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote[edit]

Dear ProManglementer,

Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.

xinbenlv ^{Talk, Remember to "ping" me} 05:06, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

Hi ProManglementer,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.

New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck[edit]

HI ProManglementer,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review[edit]

Dear editors, developers and friends:

Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.

Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.

Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!

María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]